First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

What will Ontario’s Bill 168 mean for businesses? (Part 2)

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Friday, September 11th, 2009 at 11:15

Tweet
Bill 168

Image taken from: http://www.pwiusa.com

Unfortunately, Bill 168 as it stands is vague with regard to what employers must actually do in cases where domestic violence enters the workplace. Legal authorities seem to have little direction to offer on the matter as well.

Writing for Canadian Occupational Safety magazine, Mari-Len De Guzman looks at a new seminar on Bill 168 presented by Gowlings. At the seminar that De Guzman attended, Goldie Bassi, an associate at the law firm had little to say about the domestic violence clause, noting only that:

“While there is no specific duty on the employer to report domestic violence issues, employers should build domestic violence into their health and safety policies…

“By building it into the policy, employers and employees will have guidance on how to handle domestic violence that could endanger the workers … The best way is to approach and speak to the person privately.”

Law firm, Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP, offers somewhat clearer guidance in a document titled, “Ontario’s Bully-Busting Bill: What It Means for Employers”.

“Employers need to educate employees about domestic violence, including signs of it, recognizing situations where a person is at risk, and how they can help and respond. Employers not only need to undertake the training, they need to be able to prove that they have undertaken this training.

“Employers should also be aware that the duty to take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of the worker against domestic violence will not necessarily be confined to a single location. … Accordingly, an employer’s duties to take reasonable precautions to protect a worker from domestic violence would not necessarily be confined to the employer’s main place of business, but would extend to anywhere that the worker works with the possible exception of the worker’s residence.”

I’ve found numerous mentions of the privacy concerns associated with the domestic violence clause, but it seems nobody wants to offer a firm opinion.

If the law passes, more or less in its current form, it will likely turn out that the true question is simply: what must employers do to perform due diligence with respect to domestic violence in their workplaces?

In Gowlings’ OHSLAW™ Podcast for July 2009, Bassi offers the following four basic steps employers should take to comply with the new law, as it stands:

  1. Prepare an occupational health and safety policy that addresses workplace violence and harassment. This includes:
    • Reviewing the policy at least once a year and posting the policy for employees to view
  2. Prepare and implement a workplace violence and harassment prevention program, including:
    • Procedures to control risks that could expose workers to violence; for summoning assistance in the event of a violent incident or threat thereof; for reporting incidents to a supervisor or employer; and on employer investigations and responses to incidents
  3. Conduct risk assessment on workplace violence and harassment, including domestic violence
  4. Train and inform workers on the above

Employers might also want to consider reviewing their privacy policies or federal and provincial privacy law to get an idea of where they can draw the line on investigating employees suffering from domestic abuse.

For the moment, it appears that there’s little more to say on the implications of the domestic violence clause in Bill 168. The bill might yet undergo revisions as it passes through the legislature, and Ontario’s employers will have to wait and see how it unfolds in the coming months.

Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Assistant Editor

Tags: Bill 168, domestic violence, health and safety, HR issues, Human Resources, OH&S, OHSA, ontario, workplace violence

This entry was posted on Friday, September 11th, 2009 at 11:15 and is filed under Health and Safety, Human Resources. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...

      CommentChris Davidson:
      I am a bit confused on the terminology you’re using. It has been my...

      CommentLiChing Ooi:
      Suzanne, another timely post on this standard. My question is, there are...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (4)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design