First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Is social media recruiting a discrimination land mine?

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Monday, October 19th, 2009 at 12:12

Tweet
social-media-bandwagon

Image taken from: www.expertbusinesssource.com/

Here’s a question about an issue that is becoming increasingly relevant:

By using social networking sites—such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn—to search for and recruit employees, are employers discriminating against groups that are less likely to use those services?

It might sound like a strange problem, but a quick Internet search of the terms “social media recruiting discrimination” leads to many pages of results discussing the legal implications of recruiting via the social web. A recent article in U.S. human resources magazine, Workforce Management, quotes Jessica Roe, A Minneapolis lawyer:

“Networking sites, including Twitter, exclude whole populations. … We are going to end up with a very homogeneous workforce. The social networks represent limited social groups and very small labor pools. It’s an enormous issue.”

The article’s author, Fay Hansen, goes on to point out that, “According to the latest data from Quantcast, only 5 percent of LinkedIn users are black and only 2 percent are Hispanic.”

Her point being that employers who advertise through such media are neglecting their duty under human rights legislation to open hiring to as diverse a population as possible.

The Canadian Human Rights Act states clearly:

It is a discriminatory practice for an employer, employee organization or employer organization
(a) to establish or pursue a policy or practice, or
(b) to enter into an agreement affecting recruitment, referral, hiring, promotion, training, apprenticeship, transfer or any other matter relating to employment or prospective employment,
that deprives or tends to deprive an individual or class of individuals of any employment opportunities on a prohibited ground of discrimination.

But that’s not the only issue. Some lawyers and commentators claim that employers might also get into trouble for taking a peek at candidates’ social networking profiles or typing their names into a search engine as part of their background checks. For one, even a cursory glance at a person’s Facebook public profile could give the employer more information than it would otherwise have access to, prior to an interview. This includes the candidate’s gender and race, and possibly her or his age and religion. Human rights law prohibits employers from making hiring choices based on any of these criteria (except in very specific cases), but it also prevents employers from building candidate lists based on these criteria (and others).

And then there’s the question of the accuracy of information one finds on the Internet. What if an employer makes a decision not to hire a candidate based on erroneous information the employer uncovers? Obviously that spells “Trouble”.

A recent article from HRVoice.org, the online magazine of the British Columbia Human Resources Management Association, quotes Steve Williams, director of research at the Society for Human Resource Management:

“HR tells hiring managers that if you use social networking sites, you must verify the information to avoid liability. … Misuse can lead to infringement of privacy or unintentional discrimination.”

John Rossheim, the author continues: “If, for example, you allow information gleaned online about an applicant’s age or marital status to affect a hiring decision, you could invite a lawsuit.”

It seems to me that there is little difference between Internet networking and the sort of informal word-of-mouth networking that many people claim leads to most interviews and hiring—only that the word spreads farther and faster. But I’m sure many others feel differently. How about you and your company?

For more information, take a look at this FAQ list from McCarthy Tétrault on HRinfodesk: Social Media Sites and Privacy at Work

Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Assistant Editor

Tags: canadian employment law, discrimination, employment, facebook, hiring, human rights, LinkedIn, recruiting, social, social media, social networking, twitter

This entry was posted on Monday, October 19th, 2009 at 12:12 and is filed under Human Resources, Human Rights, Recruiting and Hiring. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Is social media recruiting a discrimination land mine?”

October 21st, 2009 at 11:17

Andrew Lawson says:

Thanks for this timely advice. I am a workplace human rights advisor and I am constantly helping my clients adapt to the legal, and often hidden, challenges imposed upon employers by technology and the effect it has on human behaviour.
Employer policies that have a discriminatory effect are contrary to human rights legislation. This indirect discrimination is a practice employers need to be aware of and take steps to ensure they are NOT practising.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

October 21st, 2009 at 15:14

Sandra says:

I definitely agree with you Andrew, the problem in my mind is enforcing it. How would one even know that a certain company/employer is discriminating this way in order to take action?
I think employers that discriminate will keep doing so, social media will just make it easier for them. It’s unfortunate.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

October 21st, 2009 at 15:27

Andrew Lawson says:

Good point, Sandra. However, employers that believe they cannot “get caught” do so at their own peril. It reminds me of of indirect discrimination of years ago when employers had minimum height requirements. Not discriminatory in itself but the EFFECT was discriminatory–it excluded many women and both men and women of certain races. These employers eventually “got caught” via human right regulation and these kinds of practices are now forbidden. I can see similiar complaints being generated in association with these practices. The motto of my consulting firm is “Learn–don’t Litigate.” Employers can do so by learning lessons from the past.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...

      CommentChris Davidson:
      I am a bit confused on the terminology you’re using. It has been my...

      CommentLiChing Ooi:
      Suzanne, another timely post on this standard. My question is, there are...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (4)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design