First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Workplace or soap opera? (Part 1)

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Wednesday, December 9th, 2009 at 09:00

Tweet

soap operaAnyone who watches soap operas (Coronation Street is my favourite), shows like Desperate Housewives or reality television knows that gossip is a great way to drive a fictional plot forward. In fact, without gossip, TV would be a wasteland of talk shows, game shows, sports, documentaries and news. (And I don’t mean celebrity news!) Heck, without gossip, our lives would probably be far less interesting—at least until we found something worthwhile to talk about.

Does gossip at work function in the same way? Of course it does; but unlike on TV, there’s no writer behind the scenes to control the effects. That is, on TV, the writers use gossip to let characters know what others might be like or might be doing so the characters can make choices that will lead to the next chapter of the story. But the writers already know what happens in the next chapter—they control the characters’ responses. In the workplace, gossipers use gossip in the same ways: to offer opinions about what others are like or how they behave. The difference is that in reality there’s no way to control how others will respond to gossip.

You know what gossip is: talking about others—often belittling, mostly rumour—behind their backs, sometimes with a specific intention, such as making the victim appear less valuable to others.

You probably also have some idea of the possible negative effects of gossip:

  • Lost productivity and wasted time
  • Erosion of trust and morale
  • Anxiety among employees as rumours circulate without any clear information as to what is fact and what isn’t
  • Growing divisiveness among employees as people “take sides”
  • Hurt feelings and reputations
  • Jeopardized chances for the gossipers’ advancement as they are perceived as unprofessional
  • Attrition as good employees leave the company due to the unhealthy work atmosphere

Gossip isn’t always negative or malicious—I’m not talking about juicy celebrity or sports news here—but any time workers spread information, whether false or true, about another without that person’s knowledge, the gossipers open up the possibility of harm. And no matter the intention, or the feelings of power that go along with gossip, no individual can control where that gossip will lead.

But what can you do about it? What workplace doesn’t have a few rumours floating around? And is it all so harmful? Let me know what you think, and I’ll talk about some ways to reduce the harm from workplace gossip in the next few days.

Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Assistant Editor

Tags: gossip, productivity

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 9th, 2009 at 09:00 and is filed under Human Resources, Human Rights, Internal Controls. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...

      CommentChris Davidson:
      I am a bit confused on the terminology you’re using. It has been my...

      CommentLiChing Ooi:
      Suzanne, another timely post on this standard. My question is, there are...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (4)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design