First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Transition period for Bill 168 means: time to act

Author: Yosie Saint-Cyr

Posted on Wednesday, January 20th, 2010 at 13:00

Tweet

Ontario employers take heed, the six-month transition period provided by the government before amendments to Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act (Bill 168) come into force allow you time to prepare and be in compliance. This means implementing the new rules and measures required by law on or before June 15, 2010.

The process for implementing these new rules is time consuming and very complex. You may have to consult with lawyers, experts or some other health and safety professional or association. In short: waiting until the last minute is not a very good idea.

Here are some of the steps employers need to consider and start working on now:

  • As with most other risks, prevention of workplace violence and harassment begins with planning. Form a team of key employees to develop, review and implement a violence prevention plan and policies dealing with violence and harassment, preventive measures, measures to report, investigate and respond to incidents, support employees, and security measures, among others. This same team should also be available to deal with incidents that may arise in the future.
  • Risk assessment: assess the potential for workplace violence and harassment in your work environment. Identifying problem situations and risk factors—circumstances that may heighten the risk of violence—can involve a particular event or employee, or the workplace as a whole.
  • As appropriate, develop and execute a plan to address the various issues that result from the risk assessment process. Don’t hesitate or find excuses not to make the necessary changes to control or prevent violent or harassing incidents.
  • Re-evaluate, rethink and revise policies and practices. Draft or review existing policies and procedures to ensure that they effectively address workplace violence and harassment as required by law. Here an employer sets the standard for acceptable workplace behaviour and preventive measures. For example, you could review your recruiting and hiring practices by including preventive measures such as pre-employment screening. Identifying and screening out potentially violent people before hiring is a means of preventing workplace violence. Pre-employment screening practices must, however, be consistent with privacy protections and anti-discrimination rules under human rights law.
  • Awareness and training: one of the most critical components of an employer’s prevention program is training for employees and supervisors. This includes special training for employees who would be involved in responding to an incident of workplace violence or harassment. All employees should know how to recognize and report violent or harassing incidents, intimidating, threatening and disruptive behaviour, as well as ways of preventing or defusing volatile situations or aggressive behaviour. It is important that supervisory training include basic leadership skills such as setting clear standards, addressing employee problems promptly, and using the probationary period, performance counselling, discipline and other management tools consistently and conscientiously.

Employers must clearly communicate and instruct their employees on the law and their violence prevention plan and policies on or before June 15, 2010.

These are only a few of the things you need to think about and prepare. You have a lot of work ahead of you to ensure that you are compliant with the law at the appropriate time. Employers who fail to do so will find themselves in non-compliance with the Act and may face orders, as well as significant fines and penalties.

Have you started to look at these steps? And if you have, which one are you having most trouble with?

Yosie Saint-Cyr
Human Resources and Compliance Managing Editor

Tags: Bill 168 violence, harassment, occupational health and safety, ontario, Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, violence, workplace harassment, workplace prevention plan, workplace prevention program, workplace violence

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 20th, 2010 at 13:00 and is filed under Health and Safety, Human Resources. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Transition period for Bill 168 means: time to act”

January 20th, 2010 at 21:38

Susan Trevers says:

(1)The Act does not list the common sources/perpetrators of workplace violence. Is it assumed that employer’s responsibility extends to preventing violence from customers too or just from their own employees?

(2)How far-reaching is the “domestic violence” part? If an employee comes to work with a black eye, do I need to investigate if the cause was domestic violence and take precautionary measures? What if the employee considered this a privacy violation by the supervisor?

(3)The Act places responsibility on the employer. In big companies, HR Policies are not set by local supervisors but they come from National or International Headquarters.
If I was a supervisor in Ontario, would I be held personally accountable if my employer was found not in compliance with the Act?

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

January 20th, 2010 at 23:14

Yosie Saint-Cyr says:

Thanks Susan for the comment and “a propos questions”. However, the reponses provided are general in nature.

The violence and harassment prevention rules found in OHSA seem to be broad enough to include employers, customers, patients, co-workers, visitors, and domestic partners as long as the potential for violent or harassing behaviours or incidents are encountered at the workplace or in a workplace context.

As for the domestic violence question, I would suggest you read the blog post titled Addressing domestic violence in the workplace – some insights and the HRID article it links to. It was published on January 11, 2010.

The Act places responsibilities not just on employers but on employees and supervisors, that is what we call the Internal Responsibility System (IRS). The IRS gives everyone within a company direct responsibility for health and safety as an essential part of his or her job. In the Act, a supervisor means a person who has charge of a workplace or authority over workers (one or more). Supervisors have specific duties, responsibilities and potential liabilities under OHSA.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

January 29th, 2010 at 15:22

No Guns in the Workplace | Wrongful Dismissal & Employment Lawyer Blog says:

[...] the introduction of Bill 168 in Canada, the issue of workplace safety regarding violence has been a hot topic as of late. The incident between Arenas and Crittenton and the manner in which the NBA dealt with it is a good [...]

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design