First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Are you required to have a pay equity plan?

Author: Yosie Saint-Cyr

Posted on Friday, March 12th, 2010 at 10:53

Tweet

pay-equityOne purpose of Pay Equity is to redress differences in compensation due to systemic gender discrimination suffered by persons who occupy positions in predominantly female job categories. Only the provinces of Quebec and Ontario have pay equity legislation that covers the private sector. The Pay Equity Act in each province requires employers with 10 or more employees to provide equal pay for work of equal value.

This is the law, so I was amazed to find out how challenging the state of non-compliance is.

In Quebec, in 2008, ten years after the Pay Equity Act was enacted, women still earn 11 percent less than men. Those were the findings of an economic analysis study conducted by Analysis Group, Economic, Financial and Strategy Consultants on behalf of the Ordre des CRHA et CRIA du Québec (ORHRI). According to the Quebec government, more than half of companies had not implemented the required pay equity plan and measures, and several had not maintained their pay equity plans as required by law.

As a result, the Quebec government modified its pay equity measures last May, and these changes have repercussions for all employers. The law was amended to address several issues, including that of non-complying companies.

Companies with 10 or more employees who still find themselves in non-compliance have until December 31, 2010, to rectify the matter and implement their pay equity plan. If your company has complied but not maintained your plan up to date, new maintenance rules have been introduced. Consequently, the formal evaluation of the maintenance must be done every five years, the first being due December 31, 2010.

Any company that is not yet subject to the law must calculate the annual average salary of its workers, retroactive to 2008.

The results of the maintenance must be posted in conspicuous places at the company (notice boards, intranet, etc.). Finally, the employer must complete a statement and send it to the Quebec Pay Equity Commission.

How about Ontario? According to the Equal Pay Coalition, women in Ontario, on average, still earn 29 percent less than men. Indicating that the law in Ontario is not faring any better than in Quebec. Employers are still not complying with the Pay Equity Act, 21 years after enactment (1988). However, the Ontario government has not taken any drastic measures to enforce the law.

It may be that employers find the law very complex and not easy to comply with. Nevertheless:

  • Employers who have not yet complied with the law should proceed to take measures to comply to avoid very costly adjustment plans.
  • Employers who have complied should look closely at their pay equity plans to ensure that they have complied with the maintenance requirements.
  • Employers are required to make annual adjustments until pay equity is achieved.

The provincial governments have various tools and resources to help you achieve pay equity.

In Ontario, the tools can be found in the Library of the Pay Equity Commission website at www.payequity.gov.on.ca/peo/english/pubs_tools.html.

In Quebec, the tools can be found under Publications on the Pay Equity Commission website at www.ces.gouv.qc.ca/asp/publications.asp

Note that Quebec’s and Ontario’s Pay Equity Acts do not apply to employees of the federal government, federal agencies or federally regulated companies. The pay equity sections of the Canadian Human Rights Act cover employees of these employers.

In other Canadian jurisdictions, human rights legislation includes equal pay provisions based on the prohibited ground of sex or gender. And in some jurisdictions, there are also equality of pay provisions under the employment standards laws, which are very different from pay equity legislation.

What challenges do you face when it comes to complying with pay equity legislation?

Yosie Saint-Cyr
Human Resources and Compliance Managing Editor

Tags: Canada, compensation plan, employment law, ontario, pay equality, pay equity, pay equity act, pay equity commission, pay equity legislation, pay equity plan, pay structure, Quebec

This entry was posted on Friday, March 12th, 2010 at 10:53 and is filed under Compensation, Human Resources, Human Rights, Payroll. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design