First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

When did privacy become such a huge issue?

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Monday, March 29th, 2010 at 08:00

Tweet
shh

Image taken from: http://rogerevansonline.com

I guess you’ve heard about some of the privacy breaches of the past few years. You know, the one where a major Canadian bank faxed personal information on thousands of customers to two random businesses in West Virginia and Quebec, or where the public officials left work laptops or memory keys unattended with unencrypted private data on citizens and they were stolen, and on and on. What’s happening? Why are these accidents popping up so frequently now?

I think it’s fair to say there are numerous reasons. For example, technology has reached a point where it’s possible to carry vast amounts of information in very small containers, work practices have practically required that people transport the data away from the security of the office, and workplace policies and procedures simply have not kept up. In addition, laptops and other digital storage devices are easy targets for theft, whether the intention is to sell the item for a quick buck or to exploit sensitive data to commit much broader crimes, like identity fraud. Then there are media access, increased transparency, and legal implications: the media jump on any story about

And all of this is happening during a time of significant transformation in the awareness and nature of privacy in society: we share more and more of ourselves on blogs, Facebook, Twitter, and often don’t think of the consequences—where the information will end up, who will see it, how long it will remain out there. Legislators are trying to keep up, but it’s a slow process, and in this transitional time privacy practices involve a lot of attention and effort.

Think about this recent privacy breach: the Ottawa Citizen reports that old prescription records intended for a dump ended up strewn all over a street in Gatineau, north of Ottawa. A pharmacist found garbage bags full of papers in the basement of the pharmacy building he was moving into and asked a friend to dispose of them, without realizing that the bags contained sensitive information—namely, prescription records from several pharmacists that had occupied the building previously. The bags fell from a truck on the way to the dump, tore open and ended up all over the road. The pharmacist contacted the authorities as soon as he found out, and retrieved the records for shredding.

The case is currently under investigation by Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner, so we’ll have to wait and see what the outcome is. Will the pharmacist face a penalty or fine? Will the previous pharmacists, who exposed personal client information to future tenants? Should they? It’s hard to even take a lesson from this case before we hear the commissioner’s decision. Are organizations responsible for garbage left behind by previous tenants?

Regardless of the outcome of this case, Canadian organizations face important obligations when it comes to protecting individuals’ privacy, both proactive and reactive. Employers must be cautious in collecting, storing, using and disclosing personal information. This obligation commonly involves health information, but it could be anything deemed personal, and now in Ontario it explicitly refers to histories of violence. On the other hand, employers and employee must be cautious about information they uncover on the internet, whether intentional or not.

It’s confusing, no doubt! What does your organization do to meet its privacy compliance obligations? Have you encountered a situation where you didn’t know how to handle a piece of personal information?

Check out these other First Reference posts on privacy.

For more on privacy law and employers’ obligations, search for “privacy” on HRinfodesk.

Adam Gorley
First Reference, Human Resources and Compliance Editor

Tags: ontario, privacy, privacy breach, privacy legislation

This entry was posted on Monday, March 29th, 2010 at 08:00 and is filed under Human Resources, Internal Controls, IT, Privacy and Security, Privacy and Security. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design