First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Employee relations: Generational differences in the workplace

Author: Christina Catenacci

Posted on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010 at 10:00

Tweet
generations

Image taken from: http://www.careerfaqs.com.au

I recently read an article regarding a study about workplace expectations among the generations. The study suggests there are significant generational differences that exist in the workplace that impact workplace culture and employee relations.

In order to understand the findings, it’s first important to understand characteristics of workers belonging to the different generations, specifically: Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y; and what motivates them in their work. Various sources confirm there are certain qualities associated with each generation:

  • The “Baby Boomers” (born between 1946 and 1964) tend to make work a central part of their lives. As work-oriented individuals, baby boomers are more willing to work overtime. They are less eager to work slowly, unsupervised or take a lot of vacation. This may be due to the fact that their parents, part of the World War II generation, raised their children to appreciate the value of hard work. Not seeking work-life balance, baby boomers are primarily motivated by knowing they are valued workers. They derive personal fulfillment from work, and enjoy having meetings.
  • On the other hand, “Generation X”, “Gen X” or “Xers” (born between 1965 and 1981) tend to want jobs that come with high status, money and prestige. Though they are not as work-oriented as the baby boomers, they also value hard work. This generation places more value on balancing work with leisure. This may be due to the fact that this generation grew up with new freedoms created by social movements, and incorporated individualism into their lives. Since this generation grew up watching their parents turn into workaholics and then become downsized/restructured out of their chosen careers, this generation tends to be skeptical and does not expect job security; work is viewed as a contract. While at work, this generation is motivated by being valued as an individual, having relationships nurtured, receiving challenging work, being given the freedom to manage time and work, and receiving feedback and recognition.
  • Then there is “Generation Y”, the “Millennials” or “Generation Me” (born between 1982 and 1999). Members of this generation tend to want more vacation and want to be able to work slowly compared to those belonging to the other generations. Although they desire money and status even more than the baby boomers, they value work and results less and are less willing to work overtime. In comparison to other generations, individuals belonging to this generation are more likely to say that work is nothing more than a way to earn a living. This may be due to the fact that they grew up sheltered, pampered, nurtured and “special”. These confident individuals are not afraid to question authority and speak their minds. Their parents were less likely to discipline them, correct their mistakes or share with them the harsh realities of life. While at work, this generation is motivated most by being able to work with creative people. This is the most open-minded the least prejudiced of the generations.

It’s easy to see how generational differences could affect the workplace in terms of the culture, recruiting strategies, the way in which teams are built, dealing with change, motivating/managing employees, and maintaining/increasing productivity.

As mentioned above, the study on workplace expectations revealed that generation gaps could lead to clashes in the workplace. It examined about 16,507 high school graduates from 1976, 1991 and 2006, and found boomers and Xers in a company may find it frustrating that new generation Me employees expect more vacation without paying their dues; time to chat online or visit social networking websites at work; praise for showing up to work on time; work-life balance without any sacrifice; and more money and prestige with less work. It concluded that unrealistic expectations could also lead to disappointment among the generation Me employees, especially in today’s challenging and competitive employment climate.

I’m wondering: do you believe that generation Y is changing the face of your work environment? Has your organization experienced baby boomer-generation Y conflicts, or conflicts between older employees (baby boomers, generation Xers) versus newer employees (generation Yers)? If so, how is your organization working to ensure that the workplace retains a unified work culture?

The full study, Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing, is available at the Journal of Management.

Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Assistant Editor

Tags: baby boomers, employee relations, employment, generation gaps, generation X, Generation Y, generational difference in the workplace, generations in the workplace, recruiting and hiring, workplace culture

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010 at 10:00 and is filed under Employment Standards, Human Resources, Recruiting and Hiring. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 Responses to “Employee relations: Generational differences in the workplace”

March 30th, 2010 at 10:14

TDF100 says:

Interesting post, Christina, but it’s missing an important part of the equation: Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X). Google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s gotten lots of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. In fact, the Associated Press’ annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009.

It is important to distinguish between the post-WWII demographic boom in births vs. the cultural generations born during that era. Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. And most analysts now see generations as getting shorter (usually 10-15 years now), partly because of the acceleration of culture. Many experts now believe it breaks down more or less this way:

DEMOGRAPHIC boom in babies: 1946-1964
Baby Boom GENERATION: 1942-1953
Generation Jones: 1954-1965
Generation X: 1966-1978
Generation Y/Millennials: 1979-1993

Here are some good links about GenJones I found:

http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk

http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

March 30th, 2010 at 10:52

Christina Catenacci says:

That is an interesting point regarding the rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009…thanks for pointing it out.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design