First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Employment law update – Learn the latest!

Author: Yosie Saint-Cyr

Posted on Wednesday, May 12th, 2010 at 13:00

Tweet

This year’s Ontario Employment Law Conference co-sponsored by First Reference and Stringer Brisbin Humphrey on June 2, 2010, will touch on several topics of importance to employers; refer to the conference Agenda for details. In addition, the conference will allow employers to review recent developments in the law that affect their workplace practices, policies and programs.

conf-vid-4The first topic on the Agenda will provide employers with guidance on a significant court decision and changes in court procedures affecting the termination process. Specifically it should help employers minimize claims arising from the termination process.

How you go about deciding whether to terminate an employee, and the termination process itself, can have a great impact on whether that employee will pursue a lawsuit. Employees who feel they have been treated fairly in their termination are much less likely to pursue wrongful dismissal claims. If employers fail to act in good faith when terminating, they run the risk of being liable for significant damages.

You should evaluate your termination process in relation to the principles applied in the key Supreme Court decision, Honda v. Keays—one of the most important employment law case in Canada in years—and the new Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure that took effect on January 1, 2010.

Moreover, the Court has affirmed its decision in Wallace that an employer is entitled to terminate an employee for any reason provided it makes payment in lieu of notice, while still imposing an obligation on employers to terminate employees in a “candid, reasonable, honest and forthright” manner, and to pay damages for any wrongful termination. The Keays decision further explains the rationale behind compensating bad faith in the manner of dismissal. Meaning, the decision makes it clear that Wallace (punitive) damages are awarded for reasonably foreseeable mental distress caused by the manner of dismissal, requiring employees to prove their actual losses, rather than adding an extension to the notice period.

In regard to the new Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, actions brought in Small Claims Court proceed more quickly and are disposed of with fewer procedural steps compared to cases in the Superior Court of Justice. And now, monetary limits in Small Claims Court have been increased from $10,000 to $25,000, and under the Simplified Procedures from $50,000 to $100,000. These changes make it easier and less expensive for employees to sue their employers, providing employees with a more attractive, quick and less involved resolution of wrongful dismissal actions.

There is much more; come and learn how to manage terminations and litigation in light of these developments. Register for the 2010 Employment Law Conference — and Learn the latest!

Tags: Canada, Conference, employment law, Employment law conference, First reference, Honda v. Keays, Human Resources, ontario, Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, Small claims, Stringer Brisbin Humphrey, termination, Termination process, Wallace damages

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 12th, 2010 at 13:00 and is filed under Conferences, Human Resources, Payroll. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design