First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

AODA – Are the doorman and elevator attendant back?

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Monday, June 7th, 2010 at 10:00

Tweet

I had the pleasure of attending the recent Davis LLP Employment Law conference a couple of weeks ago, and heard some great updates on stuff HR in Ontario needs to know. Despite such pressing topics as the fast-approaching Bill 168 changes to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, almost certainly the biggest topic this year was the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). I mean, you’ve already prepared your organization for Bill 168, right—and it wasn’t too painful, was it? Well, the AODA Customer Service Standard is going to creep up quickly, too, and it will change the way you do business. (July 1, 2010 for the public sector, and January 2012 for private and non-profit organizations.)

You can read all about the Customer Service Standard in Christina’s recent post.

Somehow, hearing about removing barriers for people with all sorts of disabilities put me in a wistful mind, and got me thinking a bit old-fashioned. I thought: it’s easy to be afraid of these changes, because naturally we’re going to imagine that they’ll all require some advanced and expensive technology infrastructure. But do our solutions have to involve technology?

In the not-too-distant past, many buildings that received visitors “removed barriers” with door persons to lend a hand and open doors, concierges to offer direction, porters to carry packages and guide the way, elevator operators to assist, and so on. This was before talking elevators and automatic doors made all these jobs obsolete of course, although certainly some buildings and organizations still employ these useful anachronisms. But I wonder how a blind person is supposed to find the button to activate the automatic door in the first place.

This is where a real live person beats a machine—imagine!

Certainly there will be technological solutions; you don’t have to doubt that for a second. GPS, for example, will be the basis for many helpful applications for blind persons and people with intellectual disabilities. But when it comes to installing technology infrastructure like automatic doors, smart talking elevators and other assistive devices, as well as making other structural modifications, such as adding ramps, might it be easier (maybe even cheaper) to have someone always on hand to assist a customer in need—someone who’s more than just a salesperson? And maybe more importantly, will such “low-tech” human solutions allow organizations to comply with the law?

What do you think? Are you going to have to make big changes to your premises to comply with the AODA? Have you even thought about it?

Read more about the Act in this post from Yosie.

Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor

Tags: Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, Accessibility standards, AODA, Customer service standards, employment law, Human Resources, human rights

This entry was posted on Monday, June 7th, 2010 at 10:00 and is filed under Accessibility Standards, Standard for Customer Service. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “AODA – Are the doorman and elevator attendant back?”

June 7th, 2010 at 12:51

Sujata says:

For businesses that operate more than one location in a city and all provide the exact same services, would it be acceptable to have some of the premises accessible? Or does every location have to follow the AODA recommendations?
If a service business leases an office space in a Mall, what responsibility does the landlord have towards implementing AODA standards?

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

June 10th, 2010 at 10:04

Adam Gorley says:

Thanks for the comment Sujata.

I think your issues will fall under the proposed “Built Environment” standard—one of the five eventual standards under the AODA. “Built environment” means “access to, from and within buildings, and outdoor street spaces such as pedestrian access routes and signal systems.”

This standard is still in the review stages, and probably won’t be finalized for some time. You can find some more information about the proposed standard here: http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/en/mcss/programs/accessibility/DevelopingStandards/builtEnvironment.aspx

In other words, I don’t think there’s an answer to your questions just yet, unfortunately—but it’s great that you’re thinking about the issue!

We’ll be sure to write about the standard here well in advance of it becoming law.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design