First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Were the G8/G20 summits worth it? Tell us about your experience

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Monday, June 28th, 2010 at 10:00

Tweet
Image taken from: www.blogto.com

Image taken from: www.blogto.com

Now that The Big Do is over, and the security fences are coming down in Toronto and Huntsville—hopefully—let’s take a moment to reflect on how all the hubbub affected local businesses.

I guess the first questions are: did the G8 or G20 summit affect your operations in any way, and how?

It’s fair to say that most businesses in downtown Toronto experienced some sort of disruption over the weekend and the week leading up to the G20 summit. From what I’ve read in the papers and heard from friends who work in the security zones, many employers decided to send most employees home for the period—not on vacation mind you, but to telecommute—while maintaining a “skeleton staff” at the office. Remember, we’re talking thousands of workers—including all levels of government—here in one of the densest employment areas in the country.

But many businesses, like shops, restaurants and others that rely on walk-in customers, simply chose to close for the period. What else could they do?

I’ve read less about what’s happening in Huntsville for the G8, but I’d like to know how the summit affected organizations up there.

Another question is: was it worth it?

Besides the value of whatever potential political decisions the assembled world leaders made or agreed to make in the future, one way that people will inevitably measure the value of the summits to the cities Toronto and Huntsville and Canada in general is by the amount of money that the delegates and their retinues spent during their stay. According to this calculation, it will be mainly hotels and other accommodation and hospitality services, like caterers and limousines that have benefited.

I doubt that the costs of the summits will be balanced by the economic inputs, even though the media are saying thousands of people—mainly bureaucrats, journalists and protesters—descended on the summit locations. But I do have hope for a significant positive long-term outcome: a massive increase in telecommuting.

Maybe I’m grasping at straws here. I understand if you think so. I was surprised myself when the thought came to me the other day. But it is just possible that the summits redeem their costs by encouraging employers to rethink telecommuting. In fact, a massive boost in telecommuting could even balance the billion dollar price tag for the summits—over time, lots and lots of time.

Still, while I don’t want to say that that benefit would have made the summits entirely “worth it”—the true intended value of these things is political—I believe that telecommuting is an advance that has and will have many positive effects as it spreads throughout organizations across the country. And if that spread starts in Toronto, then great!

You’ve probably heard most of this before, but employers gain many advantages by having employees telecommute. By working from home, employees don’t have to spend hours in traffic, which has negative individual, social and environmental effects. (Personally, I believe that automobile traffic is an evil that we should be exerting great amounts of energy to combat.) Moreover, telecommuting employees don’t use workplace resources, such as electricity, heating, air conditioning and physical space.

For my part, when I work from home—which I do several days a week—I often start earlier and finish later, and I have fewer distractions.

There are disadvantages: not all employees or jobs are compatible with telecommuting, and for the moment many employees probably couldn’t handle the freedom. But reasonably simple shifts in work culture, management styles and task allocation could improve the prospects of success for a work-from-home program at any organization.

Well, what I really want to know is how the summits affected your work over the past week and weekend. Did you send workers home? Will you do so in the future? Or was it business as usual?

Adam Gorley
Human Resources and Compliance Editor

Tags: employment standards, flexible work arrangements, G20, G8, Huntsville, summit, telecommuting, Toronto, work from home, working conditions, working from home

This entry was posted on Monday, June 28th, 2010 at 10:00 and is filed under Employment Standards, Human Resources. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Were the G8/G20 summits worth it? Tell us about your experience”

June 29th, 2010 at 10:52

Sandra says:

I totally agree. Like you said, telecommuting helps businesses cut costs and that’s even more important now during a recession. I wouldn’t be surprised if we start seeing an increase in telecommuting all over the world not just in Canada.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

June 30th, 2010 at 08:27

Adam Gorley says:

Thanks for the comment Sandra. I’d like to see the same, and I think we’re going to see a pretty big jump in telecommuting across the country in the next decade.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

August 26th, 2010 at 15:51

Sandra says:

P.S. http://www.ottawasun.com/news/ottawa/2010/08/24/15127751.html

Maybe this trend will grow within municipal governments first, Ottawa is on the right track.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

August 27th, 2010 at 08:19

Adam Gorley says:

Thanks for the update Sandra. I noticed the other day that some of Toronto’s mayoral candidates are also talking about encouraging municipal employees to work at home to save money and resources. It seems that the city already has a telework policy, but it hasn’t become common practice yet.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design