First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

The latest on employer health benefits and services

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Monday, July 5th, 2010 at 10:00

Tweet
sanofi-aventus

2009 survey cover

Last year I dropped the ball on Sanofi-Aventis’ annual health care survey—in fact, it’s still sitting on my desk under a pile of other things! So this year, I’m making it a priority, and getting this brief post on the report to you right away, before I file a more in-depth article for HRinfodesk.

This year, the report looks closely at “Taking Responsibility for Health”. Engaging employees is key to success in many areas of a business today, and health is one of the most important areas. Danny Peak, a senior manager at Sanofi-Aventis Canada, notes that when employers engage employees in health, employees begin to take greater interest in their well-being, which benefits everyone. Engagement means everything from making employees aware of the health benefits available to them and the costs of the benefit program, to active promotion of positive health outcomes, for example via internal fitness programs, fun days or other initiatives.

The 2010 Survey Highlights Video and Report contains far more information than I can fit into a blog post, but here are some highlights.

While the great majority of employees (95 percent) feel that the quality of their employers’ health benefits is good or better, workers with poor health or low incomes tend to feel less positive about their benefits. The survey asks, “What can or should employers do differently to reach those plan members?”

Well, it appears that the better employers communicate their plans to employees, the better employees feel about their benefits. And vice versa; employers that don’t communicate, or do so poorly, get bad health plan ratings from their plan members. In addition, the more employees actually participate in employer-provided health and wellness programs, the more likely they are to feel positively about the benefits available to them.

There’s also disparity between the actual and perceived costs of health benefits plans, and the value that the plans provide. Almost two-thirds of plan members (60 percent) guess that their employer spends less than $1,000 per employee on health care, and a further 19 percent feel their employer spends between $1,000 and $2,000. Despite broadly underestimating the actual costs of administering a health care plan, employees place great value on the health benefits their employers provide. And those benefits became even more valuable due to the recession and continuing weak economy.

It’s hard to draw firm conclusions from such a brief look at the data, but there are a few things to think about.

Employees appreciate their employers’ health plans, and they want to participate, but sometimes they don’t have the information to do so—either the employer isn’t communicating with them or they simply can’t access it. Certain groups of employees in particular—those most at risk of poor health—under-appreciate their health plans. Low income plan members and those in poor health need more attention when it comes to plan communications. Engaging them in the plan and in their own wellness might improve their health and their perceptions about their benefits plans—and also their work performance.

On the other hand, plan members don’t understand clearly the connection between the costs of their health plans and the value they offer. They don’t want to pay more, but they don’t want to lose their benefits. Clarifying the relationship between plan costs and benefits could encourage employees to focus their wellness efforts in ways that optimize health at the lowest cost—both to them and to their employer.

My complete analysis of the 2010 health care survey is available on HRinfodesk.com (requires subscription).

Let me know in the comments if you have any questions about the survey. And take a look at Christina’s recent post about workplace wellness programs.

Adam Gorley
Human Resources and Compliance Editor

Tags: annual health care survey, Benefits, Benefits administrator, Benefits and allowances, benefits package, benefits plan, costs of health benefits plans, employee engagement, employment law, health, health benefits, health plan, Payroll, Sanofi-Aventis

This entry was posted on Monday, July 5th, 2010 at 10:00 and is filed under Benefits, Human Resources, Payroll. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design