First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

All this hot, humid and smoggy air outside… but what about indoor air quality?

Author: Christina Catenacci

Posted on Friday, July 9th, 2010 at 10:00

Tweet

smog2The last few days have been quite hot and muggy. Those without air conditioning at home are especially grateful that they can retreat inside their air-conditioned workplaces for at least most of the day; but what is the air quality inside these areas?

Employees spend a lot of time inside their workplaces, and have no choice but to breathe the air. Most take for granted that they are even breathing. However, whether it’s an office, warehouse, store or construction area, poor air quality unquestionably causes health problems.

Poor air quality can cause and exacerbate numerous health problems, such as allergies, asthma, lung cancer, respiratory infections, irritation and inflammation of the ears, nose and throat, sinus problems, and various other ailments. It may be that only the most sensitive employees or a group of employees can detect poor air quality initially, but that only means there are strong indicators that there is a problem and all employees are at risk of experiencing health problems.

Not only is this bad for the employees, but it is also a negative for the employer. Employees’ health problems due to poor air quality in the workplace can cause:

  • An increase to the employer’s costs to maintain its health care insurance package due to increased illness
  • Decreased worker productivity due to absenteeism or poor concentration
  • Low workplace morale
  • Increased workplace stress
  • Decreased workplace attachment

So what can employers do to make sure that their workplaces have good air quality?

This issue is actually a bit complicated; indoor air quality is the product of interactions among buildings, building systems and people. It may be difficult to control some of these factors.

Yet under health and safety legislation in all jurisdictions, employers have a general duty to do what is necessary to ensure the safety of their workers. This means employers should make sure the workplace has acceptable air quality. This is accomplished by testing the air quality and confirming the air meets applicable standards. Permissible levels of airborne toxic substances are set out in health and safety legislation. Employers must also ensure their employees do not do things to aggravate the problem and worsen the air quality.

Employers are recommended to:

  • Before starting operations, determine what engineering controls are necessary to prevent problems with the atmosphere; consult all applicable health and safety standards and requirements before beginning.
  • During operations, be aware of any fumes, odours or substances that may require immediate action to improve the air quality.
  • Use proper ventilation techniques whenever hazardous chemicals are used or foreign substances are present.
  • Ensure that, if necessary, workers wear respirators for adequate protection.
  • Comply with applicable smoke-free legislation.
  • Train all workers about safe air quality.
  • Have policies in place that limit employee use of chemicals that worsen air quality, such as a scent-free policy.

I’m wondering: has your company ever had to test the air due to employee complaints of illness as a result of poor air quality? If so, what was done to rectify the situation?

Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Assistant Editor

Tags: air, air quality, chemicals, environmental sensitivities, foreign substances, hazardous substances, health and safety, indoor air, indoor air quality, occupational health and safety, smoke

This entry was posted on Friday, July 9th, 2010 at 10:00 and is filed under Health and Safety, Human Resources. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design