First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

The ‘Ministry’ will investigate complaints of harassment… Really??!!

Author: Andrew Lawson

Posted on Tuesday, July 13th, 2010 at 09:30

Tweet

“The new legislation protects us from harassment, bullying. The Ministry will investigate and there is now zero tolerance for it.”

question-signTaking a respite from the heat wave that affected most of Central Canada last week, I dropped into a Tim Hortons for some cool refreshment. Seated near me was a group of workers who were dressed in similar uniforms. I think they were all cleaning staff from a nearby business. One of the group seemed to be a leader of sorts and was offering the above advice and information.

The leader was explaining to the group of workers that new legislation has been enacted in Ontario that will protect all of them if they are being harassed at work. As a human rights advisor and educator I was encouraged to overhear this educational conversation. I get excited when I hear people talking about how the law applies to their situation!

I was concerned however that part of the message this group was hearing was incorrect and misleading. Their leader was telling them that the “ministry” would investigate their complaints of harassment. This information was warmly received by the group, and I could almost see the complaint forms being filled out!!

The misinformation being distributed during this “staff meeting” reinforced for me the importance of providing competent staff training conducted by a knowledgeable, experienced professional.

The information these workers was being given was just plain wrong.

A quick search of the Ministry of Labour website reveals the following statement:

“It is not the role of ministry inspectors to resolve or mediate specific allegations of harassment in the workplace.”

The Ministry of Labour will investigate to ensure employers have policies and procedures in place for dealing with complaints of harassment and violence.

The ministry will investigate to ensure you have completed a violence risk assessment specific to your workplace.

The ministry will investigate to ensure you are communicating with your employees on these issues.

The ministry will not, as stated on its website, resolve specific complaints of harassment in the workplace.

Investigating specific complaints is the responsibility of the employer.

So, the group leader was partially correct. Legally, there is now less tolerance for harassment in the workplace in Ontario. Employers are responsible for creating a complaints process and educating employees on how a complaint will be handled.

The Ministry of Labour is responsible for ensuring employers have these systems in place; not for investigating complaints. The ministry furthermore has the legal authority to issue orders to comply where an employer is in contravention of the law and to prosecute an employer, supervisor or worker for failing to comply with an inspector’s order.

Learn—don’t Litigate. Obtain professional, knowledgeable assistance and train your staff today. Don’t wait for them to pick it up at Tim Hortons!

Andrew Lawson
Human Rights Advisor, Learn Don’t Litigate
www.learndl.ca

Tags: harassment, harassment prevention, health and safety, health and safety training, investigate complaints of harassment, investigation, ministry inspectors, Ministry of Labour, occupational health and safety, OHSA, Ontario Ministry of Labour, Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, Tim Horton, training, violence, violence prevention, workplace harassment, workplace harassment prevention guide, workplace investigation

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 13th, 2010 at 09:30 and is filed under Health and Safety, Human Resources. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “The ‘Ministry’ will investigate complaints of harassment… Really??!!”

July 13th, 2010 at 09:46

Lee S says:

Maybe if the employees had the proper training they would know that it is not the ministrys duty to solve problems of harassment in the workplace. Alot of compainies think creating policies and having there employees sign them off is complying with the bill 168. They will find out the hard way.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

July 13th, 2010 at 09:52

Barb Ward says:

Great article in explaining what the Ministry will and will not handle!

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

July 13th, 2010 at 13:47

Andrew Lawson says:

You’re absolutely right. As a legal representative and now a workplace educator, I see first-hand the cost to employers who fail to understand the value of quality training. Training is like insurance and why my motto is “LEARN–don’t Litigate. Thanks for the comment.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

July 13th, 2010 at 13:50

Andrew Lawson says:

Thanks for the comment, Barb. In talking to my clients and planning for training I find there is still a great lack of understanding about the actual requirements of Bill 168. This type of legislation signals a new era in lawmaking–less governmental responsibility and more employer responsibility.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

July 13th, 2010 at 17:24

Rusti-Ann Blanke, RST Training & Consulting says:

Good summary! In my experience both with OHS and as a trainer/consultant, the observations in your article cannot be repeated often enough. I mean that literally…the role of OHS continues to be similarly misconstrued here in Saskatchewan, and our legislation has been in place since 2007. The right to seek assistance from OHS is routinely misconstrued as a request triggering an investigation by OHS. In fact, OHS’s role is ensure the employer is fulfilling its obligations under the legislation to take reasonable steps to address concerns and complaints of harassment pursuant to a compliant policy.

My guess is that most employers don’t have a policy that complies with the 1993 legislation (human rights based harassment), much less the amendment, but the biggest gap is lack of education/awareness and training.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

July 13th, 2010 at 17:47

Rusti-Ann Blanke, RST Training & Consulting says:

Saskatchewan has had similar legislation in place since 2007. With or without such legislation, a policy is virtually worthless for preventing or resolving harassment(formally or ADR) unless its developed to suit the business (as opposed to slapped together to comply with the Act/regs), and accompanied by appropriate education and training. In my experience (law, complaint investigation, OHS education /training and consulting), most employers don’t seek out that training and need “convincing” as to its importance.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...

      CommentChris Davidson:
      I am a bit confused on the terminology you’re using. It has been my...

      CommentLiChing Ooi:
      Suzanne, another timely post on this standard. My question is, there are...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (4)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design