First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

For small and medium-sized businesses, cross-training can be a lifesaver

Author: Adam Gorley

Posted on Monday, July 26th, 2010 at 09:30

Tweet

An organization with dedicated departments and strictly delineated staff roles might be easy to manage when things are running smoothly, but what happens when someone gets sick, goes on vacation or abruptly leaves the company, and there’s no one else who can perform that person’s duties? Or what if all employees who can perform a certain duty are away from work at the same time? The last thing you want to be doing is scrambling to figure out how to do something at the last minute when you expected it to be done a week before, or training someone to do something entirely new while a deadline looms.

These situations, which are more likely to affect smaller businesses with fewer employees than big ones, call for flexibility and cross-training.

What is cross-training? Essentially, it means training an employee to perform tasks that are outside of her direct domain of responsibility.

For example, as a writer and editor at First Reference and HRinfodesk, my domain is writing, researching, editing and copy editing for our various publications. However, my training extends to the various modes of production we use, including print production, web production and quality control, among other things. With this additional knowledge, I can take over from colleagues who do these things regularly, when necessary.

If that sounds obvious, then you probably already cross-train your staff to some extent, but you might want to take a moment and consider: are there any positions at your workplace that only one person has the knowledge to perform? If the answer is yes, and that position involves critical functions, you might be waiting for trouble. What would you do if that person couldn’t work at a time when you needed the work he was responsible for?

Besides this fundamental function of cross-training, there are other advantages, for both employers and their employees.

Employers gain the benefits of a more skilled and flexible staff. This mean that, when a shift occurs at the organization, employees are more likely to be prepared and maybe even willing to move into new roles. Moreover, employees with diversified training can look at situations and problems from different angles. Cross-training also exposes staff to other workers’ responsibilities, increasing communication, understanding and (hopefully!) respect among colleagues. Further, employees with diversified roles are less likely to become bored of their jobs. All of these things can help improve productivity, morale, team spirit and co-operation, and reduce absenteeism, presenteeism and other workplace maladies.

Cross-training might even form the basis of a strong succession planning program. By training staff members in the duties of managers, an employer will discover which employees have the requisite skills and which need more training to move up, and the employer can plan accordingly, perhaps while giving a manager or two time for a much-needed vacation!

I know I’m forgetting advantages (and maybe some disadvantages), so please tell me about your adventures in cross-training. Have you been “stuck” without that critical person at the wring time? Have you successfully used cross-training to promote skilled employees?

Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor

Tags: cross-training, employee relations, succession planning, training, training and development, workplace management

This entry was posted on Monday, July 26th, 2010 at 09:30 and is filed under Human Resources, Training and Development. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “For small and medium-sized businesses, cross-training can be a lifesaver”

July 26th, 2010 at 11:40

Sujata says:

I agree fully with Adam that there are great advantages to cross-training (or building redundancy as I call it).
But the disadvantage? Be prepared for the day when the boss discovers you can do the work of two and abolishes one of the roles. You end up with two jobs for one paycheque.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

July 26th, 2010 at 12:19

Adam Gorley says:

Thanks Sujata—I want to laugh at your comment, because I actually cut from my final post a comment related to what you’re saying:
“Of course, it’s important not to overwork cross-trained employees. Just because they know how to do more, doesn’t mean that they’ve all of a sudden got more time to work.”

But you’re serious and I’m sure you’re right, too!

Still, an employer that does that might find itself facing a charge of constructive dismissal, or significant claims for overtime pay…

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

July 30th, 2010 at 12:19

Adam Gorley says:

Speaking of forgetting, I forgot that Yosie wrote a post on cross-training late last year!

She offers a good detailed look at the topic, including many more advantages:

http://blog.firstreference.com/2009/12/16/the-importance-of-cross-training/

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...

      CommentChris Davidson:
      I am a bit confused on the terminology you’re using. It has been my...

      CommentLiChing Ooi:
      Suzanne, another timely post on this standard. My question is, there are...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (4)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design