First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Breastfeeding at work

Author: Yosie Saint-Cyr

Posted on Wednesday, August 4th, 2010 at 10:00

Tweet

breastfeedingA recent amendment to the US Fair Labor Standard Act (FLSA) requires employers to provide reasonable break time and a suitable location for an employee to express breast milk for her nursing child. If Canadian employers did not know, there are similar provisions in Canada as well, under human rights legislation.

Across Canada, human rights legislation protects people from discrimination and harassment based on sex/gender; this protection includes pregnancy and breastfeeding. It is illegal to discriminate because a woman is pregnant. It is also illegal to discriminate because a woman was pregnant, had a baby or might become pregnant.

“Pregnancy” is understood to extend beyond the date of delivery and post-delivery recovery. The length of the extension depends on the circumstances of the mother.

Employees may have special needs because they want to become pregnant, they are pregnant or because they have just had a baby or a miscarriage. Employers are required to accommodate women who have special needs because of pregnancy. The only exception to this duty is if accommodation would create an undue hardship; meaning, if what needs to be done is simply too difficult or expensive, or if it creates serious health and safety hazards.

The Human Rights Commissions in Ontario and the Western and Atlantic provinces, as well as the Canadian Human Rights Commission, generally recognize a woman’s right to breastfeed a child in public areas, and have policies, guidelines or statements promoting women’s right to breastfeed a child in public areas, including restaurants, retail stores, shopping centres and theatres, etc. Women should not be prevented from nursing a child in a public area, nor be asked to move to another area that is more discreet. This right also extends to the workplace.

As stated by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in relation to breastfeeding:

“In their working lives, women face particular challenges and obstacles that men do not. A woman who opts to breastfeed her baby takes on a child-rearing responsibility which no man will ever truly face. In order for a working mother to bestow on her child the benefits that nursing can provide, she may require a degree of accommodation. Otherwise, she may end up facing a difficult choice that a man will never have to address. On the one hand, stop nursing your child in order to continue working and making a living for yourself and your family. On the other hand, abandon your job to ensure that your child will be breastfed.”

Moreover, women should not have to choose between their own health or the health of their baby, and their jobs. Accommodating nursing mothers could include:

  • Allowing an employee’s partner or caregiver to bring the baby into the workplace for feeding
  • Arranging a quiet and dignified place to breastfeed
  • Providing breaks for pumping or breastfeeding as necessary
  • Making scheduling changes to permit time to express milk or breastfeed at work or to reach home in time to breastfeed
  • Providing an area to store breast milk at work

Where a breastfeeding employee needs to be accommodated, she is responsible for clearly informing the employer of her needs and of the accommodation required, preferably in writing.

It is the responsibility of the employer to create and provide a supportive environment. Generally, employers can create such an environment with minimum disruption. If an employer refuses a request for accommodation related to breastfeeding, the onus is on the employer to show the accommodation would cause an undue hardship.

Yosie Saint-Cyr
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Managing Editor

Tags: Breastfeeding, discrimination, duty to accommodate, Employer duty to accommodate, Fair Labor Standards Act, gender, harassment, human rights commission, human rights legislation, human rights tribunal, pregnancy, sex, undue hardship

This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 4th, 2010 at 10:00 and is filed under Human Resources, Human Rights. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (8)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design