First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Angry bloggers beware! – Your anonymity is not guaranteed

Author: Maanit Zemel

Posted on Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 10:00

Tweet

steamIs your boss or co-worker getting on your nerves? Are you irritated with your neighbour? Do you feel like venting out by writing some nasty stuff about them on Twitter or on a blog? If you do it anonymously, no harm done, right?

Wrong. We all take our reputation very seriously, and rightly so. A person’s reputation contributes greatly to his or her personal and professional success. Similarly, a business’ reputation and goodwill are significant contributors to its financial strength.

When you post something online, you leave a cyber-trail, which, with varying degrees of difficulty, can be traced back to you. When you go as far as defaming someone online, that person can apply to a Canadian court for an order requiring your Internet service provider to disclose your identity and contact information.

In York University v. Bell Canada Enterprises et al, for example, York University alleged that its professors were being defamed by anonymous bloggers online. The postings were made by someone with a “Gmail” account. An order was issued against Google, requiring it to disclose the Internet protocol addresses associated with the Gmail account. Google complied with the order, and it was revealed that the anonymous bloggers were customers of Bell Canada and Rogers Communications. The Ontario court issued another order against Bell and Rogers, requiring them to reveal the identities of the anonymous bloggers.

Once your identity is uncovered, you might face a defamation lawsuit in Canada or elsewhere and, if the victim is your employer or co-worker, you might also find yourself without a job. So, the next time you are feeling frustrated and need to blow off some steam, stay off the Internet. Try writing in your old-fashioned personal diary (the one stashed away in your nightstand), or maybe take a yoga class.

Maanit Zemel, Associate
Miller Thomson LLP

Tags: anonymity, anonymous bloggers, anonymous comments, bloggers, Blogging, blogs, comments, cyber-libel, cyber-trail, cyberlibel, defamation, defamatory, defamatory comments, defamatory statements, disclosure, facebook, internet defamation, Internet protocol addresses, libellous, online defamation, reputation, social media, social networking, twitter, York University v. Ball Canada Enterprises et al

This entry was posted on Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 10:00 and is filed under Human Resources, Internal Controls, IT, Privacy and Security, Privacy and Security. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Angry bloggers beware! – Your anonymity is not guaranteed”

August 9th, 2010 at 10:38

Sujata says:

What if the blog posts were true facts and can be proven as such – is that still considered defamation?
If the blogger actually borught the matter to the attention of the organization/person and was frustrated by their unwillingness to do anything about it?

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

August 9th, 2010 at 10:53

Maanit Zemel says:

Dear Sujata,

Thank you for your question. You raise a very good issue that many people have trouble grappling with.
When you post something online about another person or organization and that person or organization believes it to be defamatory (meaning that it makes them appear less in the eyes of another person), you can be sued for defamation, whether or not you believe the statemet to be true. Once in court, it will be up to you to prove that the statement was true. In other words, the plaintiff will not have to prove that the statement was false.
If you can prove the statement’s veracity, you may not be found guilty of defamation at trial, however, you will still have to defend a defamation lawsuit, which can be very costly.
I hope that answers your question,
Maanit

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design