First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Proposed integrated accessibility standards under the AODA

Author: Yosie Saint-Cyr

Posted on Wednesday, September 8th, 2010 at 09:30

Tweet

service-ontarioOn September 2, 2010, the Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services published the proposed Integrated Accessibility Regulation (IAR) under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). The proposed regulation is available for public consultation by interested stakeholders on the government’s Regulatory Registry website. The IAR combines the information and communications, employment and transportation standards into a single, integrated regulation. Proposed compliance timelines are also listed.

  • The Information and Communications Standard focuses on accessible information and communications relating to the provision of goods and services.
  • Requirements for employment prescribe how organizations provide accessibility for people with disabilities across all stages of the employment life cycle; for example, recruitment, retention, etc.
  • Requirements for transportation will prevent and remove barriers so that people with disabilities can more easily access transportation services across the province.

The requirements being proposed for inclusion in the Integrated Accessibility Regulation are intended to apply to all organizations that provide goods or services to the public or other third parties and have at least one employee in Ontario. The class structure is based on the following (unless otherwise stated):

  • Government of Ontario
  • Broader public organizations (BPS) with 50+ employees
  • Broader public organizations with 1–49 employees
  • Private and not-for profit organizations with 50+ employees
  • Private and not-for-profit organizations with 1–49 employees

Private and not-for-profit organizations with 1–49 employees will be exempt from certain requirements such as compliance reporting.

The Transportation Standard will mainly impact BPS 50+. However, if small transportation providers have transportation systems, they are subject to transportation requirements as scheduled for BPS 50+.

Proposed legal requirements common to all three standards include policies and procedures, training and enforcement as follows:

Policies and procedures

Every obligated organization will be required to establish, maintain and implement policies governing the implementation of the accessibility standards (Information and Communications, Employment and Transportation). The policies will be required to include:

  • A description of how the organization will meet the requirements of the accessibility standards; and
  • A statement of commitment for meeting the needs of persons with disabilities in a timely manner.

The government of Ontario and every broader public organization will be required to establish and maintain policies on how the organization will consider the needs of persons with disabilities when procuring or acquiring goods, services and facilities.

The government, all broader public organizations and private and not-for profit organizations with 50+ employees will be required to prepare one or more written document(s) describing their policies and be able to provide a copy of the document(s) to any person who requests them in a format that meets the person’s needs. Note: upon request for alternative formats, organizations are not required to have every format in stock, but rather have the means to provide the information as soon as possible, once the request has been made.

Training

In addition, all employees, volunteers, persons who provide services on behalf of an organization and persons who participate in developing the policies, practices and procedures of an organization, will be required to be trained on the requirements of the accessibility standards.

Training must be provided on an ongoing basis and be appropriate to the duties of the employees, volunteers and other persons. All obligated organizations will be required to provide accessibility training on achieving an accessible workplace to employees.

Enforcement

Two elements of the inspection and enforcement system will be regulated within the Compliance Assurance Framework under the Integrated Accessibility Regulation:

  • An administrative monetary penalties scheme is being established under the AODA. The scheme will allow the director or a designate to issue an order against a person, organization or corporation to pay a penalty amount as a result of non-compliance with the AODA or the accessibility standards. The largest lump sum penalty amount that can be issued to an individual or an organization that is not a corporation is $2,000, and the maximum for a corporation is $15,000. The amount of the penalties will be set out in a regulation.
  • Under section 26 of the AODA, the ministry must designate a tribunal within a reasonable time after the first accessibility standard is in place. It was determined that the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) will be designated as the tribunal to hear appeals of director’s orders under the AODA. The LAT is the most suitable existing tribunal for designation as it handles appeals related to businesses meeting prescribed standards or requirements under regulations and statutes. The tribunal will be responsible for hearing appeals from directors’ orders including orders for administrative penalties issued against a person or organization for contravention of the Act or accessibility standard(s) or other regulation.

Furthermore…

The government is also proposing to amend Ontario Regulation 629 to modernize the technical requirements for highway vehicles (e.g., buses, transit buses, motor coaches, taxis, physically-disabled-passenger vehicles and school buses) as part of the ministry’s proposed standards under the AODA. As mentioned, the ministry is proposing that the Transportation Standard be part of the Integrated Accessibility Regulation.

According to the government, the proposed integrated regulation will streamline, align and phase-in accessibility requirements. This will allow for progress on accessibility and reduce regulatory burden for obligated organizations.

Stakeholders and interested parties are invited to comment on the IAR and proposed amendments to Ontario Regulation 629 before October 16, 2010. All comments on the proposed regulation must be directed through the Regulatory Registry.

A more detailed commentary on these proposed standards and their specific requirements is published on HRinfodesk (login required).

Yosie Saint-Cyr
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Managing Editor

Tags: Accessibility Directorate of Ontario, Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, accessibility for people with disabilities, Accessibility standards, AODA, compliance timelines, employment, Employment accessibility standard, enforcement, IAR, Integrated Accessibility Regulation, integrated accessibility standards, O. Reg. 629, Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services, policies, policies and procedures, policy manual, Private sector, Proposed Accessibility Requirements, Proposed integrated accessibility standards under the AODA, public consultation, Regulatory Registry, The Information and Communications Standard, the Licence Appeal Tribunal, training, Transportation standards

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 8th, 2010 at 09:30 and is filed under Accessibility Standards, Human Resources, Integrated Accessibility Regulation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Internal Controls
      • Environmental Law
      • Finance and Accounting
      • IT, Privacy and Security
      • Not-for-Profit
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentLeslie D Foreman:
      I agree with the court decision. Granting a full 52 weeks leave for an adoptive...

      CommentDr. Mike Michael:
      While there are many factors associated with depression, a main cause is the...

      CommentAndrew Taillon:
      Thanks Chris. I would suggest that the confusion arises from the way damages were...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (26)
    • December 2011 (27)
    • November 2011 (24)
    • October 2011 (22)
    • September 2011 (34)
    • August 2011 (27)
    • July 2011 (25)
    • June 2011 (35)
    • May 2011 (29)
    • April 2011 (28)
    • March 2011 (27)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (22)
    • December 2010 (23)
    • November 2010 (23)
    • October 2010 (22)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (28)
    • July 2010 (26)
    • June 2010 (29)
    • May 2010 (32)
    • April 2010 (24)
    • March 2010 (22)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (11)
    • November 2009 (14)
    • October 2009 (16)
    • September 2009 (11)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design