First Reference Talks

Business, Payroll, Employment Law, Internal Controls & You!

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Free Updates

Women’s expectations in the workplace may play critical role in how they are treated at work

Author: Christina Catenacci

Posted on Friday, May 27th, 2011 at 09:00

Canadian women starting their careers still expect to earn considerably less than men, wait longer then men for promotions, and have lower salaries after five years of working, according to a soon-to-be-released study. This despite the fact that some believe we are reaching the point of equality in the workplace. Why is this happening? Why do women still have these expectations?

The study analyzed 23,000 Canadian university students’ responses to career-related questions. Among it’s key findings, young women expect:

  • An average initial salary 13.5 percent lower than young men for equivalent jobs
  • To wait 12 percent longer to get their first promotion
  • Salaries after five years of working that are 17.5 percent less than men anticipate

This is unsettling. Even the researchers were surprised. They concluded that the gap in salary expectations appears not to have closed at all.

However, these expectations are in line with reality, as I noted previously here, here, here and here. Simply put, there is a corresponding significant gap in actual earnings.

Why is this still happening? The mere reaction to the study findings should be a strong indicator that something is not right.

Here’s a potential clue: another interesting finding was that the gender gap in pre-career salary expectations was greatest in traditionally male-dominated fields. So, too, are the actual earnings gaps in these fields. The researchers suggested that, though young women are entering male-dominated fields in greater numbers, this does not automatically lead to more equality for women in the labour market.

Why? Women form their expectations based on historical gender-role stereotyping and discrimination present in the labour market.

Could this be why they preferred “beta” career priorities (things like work-life balance leading to lower salaries) compared to men who preferred “alpha” career priorities (things such as quick advancement and building a sound financial base)?

After synthesizing the results, the researchers suggested:

  • Educators and career counsellors should continue to encourage young women to pursue careers that have been traditionally dominated by men
  • Government programs should continue to address the under-representation of women in male-dominated fields
  • Women in senior positions should try to act as role models for young women to show it is possible to break into male-dominated fields and senior management, and provide access to important networks
  • Women should ask themselves whether they want to make a trade-off between salary and work-life balance
  • Women must be firm when negotiating and demanding what their male counterparts are expecting

This study and its resulting suggestions reminds me of a book I read (a few times) by Lois Frankel, titled, Nice Girls Don’t Get the Corner Office 101: Unconscious Mistakes Women Make that Sabotage Their Careers.

This is one of my favourite books. It is premised upon the notion that women have internalized some traditional values and beliefs concerning their roles in society that hold them back in their careers.

As a result, women unconsciously make some significant mistakes, particularly in these ways:

  • How you play the game
  • How you act
  • How you think
  • How you brand and market yourself
  • How you sound
  • How you look
  • How you respond

(These categories correspond to the book’s chapters.)

Altogether, there are 101 mistakes listed in the book. Highly recommended.

What do you think? Do you believe that the root of the problem involves historical gender-role stereotyping and discrimination that finds its way into the labour market? Could this be why women continue to have both lower expectations and lower earnings then men?

Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor

Tags: career, career counsellors, discrimination, employment law, equal pay for equal work, equality for women, equality in the workplace, gap in actual earnings, gender gap, historical gender-role stereotyping, labour market, lower earnings, male-dominated fields, management, negotiation, Nice Girls Don’t Get the Corner Office 101, pay equity, salary, salary expectations, Unconscious Mistakes Women Make that Sabotage Their Careers, under-representation of women in male-dominated fields, Women’s expectations in the workplace, work-life balance

This entry was posted on Friday, May 27th, 2011 at 09:00 and is filed under Employee Relations, Human Resources, Recruiting and Hiring. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Women’s expectations in the workplace may play critical role in how they are treated at work”

May 31st, 2011 at 19:08

Benoit Roussy says:

I would like to see an objective on the same jobs. Not so-called equivalent but actual same jobs rather than studies on perceived realities. I hire people in my admittedly very small business and don’t base the salaries on gender. In fact right now, the women make more than the men. My colleagues in my field are 50/50 and salaries are the same for women and men. I am sure that this is probably a recent phenomenon and probably only applies to those of the last generation or so entering the labourforce. Women in ther 50′s or older would be a different story due to past trends. We should all be equal but shouldn’t discourage students into thinking they don’t have that equality right now.

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

June 1st, 2011 at 10:52

Christina Catenacci says:

Thanks for your comment Benoit. I think the closest thing to what your are seeking would be the objective comparisons on actual earnings – they clearly show significant differences and an unquestionable and persistent wage gap between men and women. Take a look at the four links I provided for this information. That said, these are averages – I am glad to hear that it is not happening everywhere!

Christina

Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products or that seek personal legal advice. Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.




Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

  • Get Free Updates

    RSS and Email

  • 2012 Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference

    2011 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

    2010 Canadian Law Blog Finalist

  • Categories

    • Accessibility Standards
      • Integrated Accessibility Regulation
      • Standard for Customer Service
      • Standard for Employment
      • Standard for Information and Communications
      • Standard for the Built Environment
      • Standard for Transportation
    • Announcements
    • Conferences
    • Human Resources
      • Corporate Immigration
      • Employee Relations
      • Employment Standards
      • Health and Safety
      • HR Analytics
      • HRMS
      • Human Rights
      • Privacy and Security
      • Recruiting and Hiring
      • Training and Development
      • Union Relations
    • Payroll
      • Benefits
      • Compensation
      • Source Deductions and Reporting
  • Recent Comments

      CommentChristina Catenacci:
      Thanks for your comment Troy. I have discussed this issue with many people...

      CommentTroy:
      And what about the passive smoke from SMOKERS? If someone who doesn’t smoke...

      CommentYosie Saint-Cyr:
      Hi Marcia, I participated in the program two years ago on behalf of FR… It...



  • First Reference:
    @firstreference

    Yosie Saint-Cyr:
    @yosie23

    Adam Gorley:
    @agorley

  • Like us on Facebook!



  • Links

    • First Reference
    • HR eSource
    • HRinfodesk
    • HRtrack
    • Human Resources Advisor
    • PolicyPro
  • Blogroll

    • Inside internal controls
    • All About Information
    • Chambers on the Profession
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Governance & Risk Management Blog
    • Corporate Reporting to Stakeholders
    • Daniel A. Lublin Employment Law Blog
    • Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog
    • Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada
    • Human Right in the Workplace
    • International Corporate Governance
    • Leech Talks Risk
    • Marks on Governance
    • Osgoode Labour & Employment Law Society
    • SBH Lawyers blog
    • Slaw
    • Thoughts from a Management Lawyer
  • Post Archives

    • May 2012 (21)
    • April 2012 (26)
    • March 2012 (30)
    • February 2012 (26)
    • January 2012 (23)
    • December 2011 (25)
    • November 2011 (19)
    • October 2011 (19)
    • September 2011 (30)
    • August 2011 (21)
    • July 2011 (22)
    • June 2011 (30)
    • May 2011 (25)
    • April 2011 (25)
    • March 2011 (23)
    • February 2011 (16)
    • January 2011 (21)
    • December 2010 (20)
    • November 2010 (17)
    • October 2010 (19)
    • September 2010 (22)
    • August 2010 (25)
    • July 2010 (20)
    • June 2010 (24)
    • May 2010 (28)
    • April 2010 (20)
    • March 2010 (19)
    • February 2010 (9)
    • January 2010 (11)
    • December 2009 (9)
    • November 2009 (11)
    • October 2009 (13)
    • September 2009 (9)
  • Questions?

    Email us:
    editor[at]firstreference.com

Copyright © 2012 - First Reference | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Twitter | Facebook

WordPress theme designed by web design