First Reference company logo

First Reference Talks

News and Discussions on Payroll, HR & Employment Law

decorative image

A brief understanding of Internet defamation or cyber-libel

cyber-libelInternet communication through social networking (or social media), such as Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace and Twitter, is fast becoming the most popular mode of communication in the 21st century, and has facilitated freedom of expression and speech, globalization of information and even popular revolutions. Many people enjoy posting their personal views, opinions and musings on blogs, chat rooms, newspaper and magazine articles, and other forums on all topics—artistic, philosophical, educational, social, political and legal.

According to the Centre for Constitutional Studies at the University of Alberta:

The Internet provides the public with an amazing opportunity to exercise and enjoy the constitutionally protected right to freedom of expression. Posting thoughts and ideas on the Internet has become a quick and efficient way to communicate with others. Websites with interactive services like chat rooms and bulletin boards allow Internet users to debate and discuss any topic they wish. And if you cannot find a website that appeals to you, you are free to create your own.

With the freedom to publish without pre approval or prior censorship, material is posted online that would not be printed in a mainstream newspaper. A newspaper company has editors, experienced journalists, and lawyers, all trained to protect the company from liability. In comparison, the average Internet user or website operator may be totally unaware of the potential liability that can result from publishing defamatory material. The Internet may appear to provide total freedom of expression, but defamation law applies to what is published on the Internet and limits what people can post online.

But what is Internet defamation?

First we must understand what is traditional defamation, which may also be referred to as libel, slander, disparagement, defamation of character, and other things.

Legally, defamation is established when a plaintiff proves that the defendant has made a defamatory statement to a third party (newspaper, magazines, fliers or letters) regarding the plaintiff. A defamatory statement is any statement that would, in the estimation of “reasonable” persons, lower the reputation of the plaintiff in his or her community.

Once the plaintiff has established that defamatory words were published, the onus shifts to the defendant to prove that the offending words are defensible. The usual defences to a defamation claim are that the words claimed to be defamatory were:

  • True (justified) — In Canada, the onus is on the defendant to prove that allegedly defamatory comments are substantially true
  • Fair comment (not malicious) — Honestly held expressions of opinion on matters of public interest, based on facts
  • Published on an occasion of privilege — Provincial statutes provide a defence of privilege to various forms of reports; for example, the statutory privilege for fair and accurate reports on court proceedings. In addition to court proceedings, legislation also protects fair and accurate reports on public meetings and communications, and decisions by bodies that represent governmental authority in Canada. In addition to statutory privileges, the common law recognizes a qualified privilege that protects defamatory statements when the defendant had a legal, moral or social duty in making the statement, and the recipient of the information had a corresponding interest in receiving the information. Qualified privilege has been recognized in numerous situations, including communications regarding employment (for example, reference letters), family, union matters, business-to-business interests, litigation and medical concerns. The question in each case is whether or not there is an interest in publishing and a corresponding interest in receiving the information.

Defamation is a common law tort that is very complex; communications on the Internet exacerbate the situation. Internet defamation, or “cyber-libel”, is adapted from the traditional defamation principles to deal with online communication (message boards, bulletin boards, email, blogs, chat rooms, personal websites, social media, social networking sites, or other published articles).

A couple of things that make Internet defamation especially complex are anonymity and the lack of geographical limits to information online.

Internet defamation or cyber-libel laws are still evolving all over the world. As a result, many existing cases are contradictory, and there is no firm judicial precedent.

For more and a list of Canadian court decisions involving the publication of allegedly defamatory material via the Internet, McConchie Law Corporation has a good website.

Also, Defamation Bytes: The Law of Internet Defamation in Canada, by law firm Macleod Dixon examines the main legal issues in Canada and how Canadian courts have handled this topic so far.

Yosie Saint-Cyr
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Managing Editor

Follow me

Yosie Saint-Cyr

Managing Editor at First Reference Inc.
Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B., is a trained lawyer called to the Quebec bar in 1988 and is still a member in good standing. She practiced business, employment and labour law until 1999. For over 15 years, Yosie has been the Managing Editor of the following publications, Human Resources Advisor, Human Resources PolicyPro, HRinfodesk and Accessibility Standards PolicyPro from First Reference. Yosie is one of Canada’s best known and most respected HR authors, with an extensive background in employment and labour across the country. Read more
Follow me
Kindle

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments are currently closed.

3 thoughts on “A brief understanding of Internet defamation or cyber-libel
  • LK says:

    Defamation is one of the worst crimes in this world. You see, in other crimes the victim is usually able to get back to their life. Once defamed however it can be impossible. The internet allows one to destroy another’s life within a couple of minutes. Some of the offenders are keenly aware that their lies will or might destroy another. The world needs to have a harmonized law that severely punishes one convicted of defamation and restores the life of the victim.

  • Nalliah Thayabharan says:

    Welcome to the new digitally connected world where a reference check begins with an online search.
    The viral forms of social justice are completely uncontrollable and they often lose sight of the difference between opinion and a legal verdict. The internet justice has given many people a life sentence.
    Internet justice, unlike the government justice system, is swift and severe—and not necessarily right or fair. Internet justice is often public vengeance writ large and sometimes an extreme form of bullying.
    There is a reason, however slow and unwieldy, that the administration of justice has been delegated to the government.

  • PaulJenkins33 says:

    Malicious comments made online about a person can really potentially destroy that person’s opportunities of employment and social status. I’ve seen countless cases where internet defamation has played a major role in people’s lives, and because of negative stuff written about them online, they were denied a chance at employment or were shunned by society.