First Reference company logo

First Reference Talks

News and Discussions on Payroll, HR & Employment Law

decorative image

bad faith damages

Talking damages: Put your money where your mouth is

When it comes to human rights cases, awards for general damages are often less than $10,000, even though the $10,000 cap on general damages was removed almost a decade ago.

 

, , , , , , , , , , ,

Court rules workers compensation legislation bars civil claim for harassment and bullying

There appears to be a growing trend of employee claims against employers arising from their treatment in the workplace. This can take many forms such as an action for constructive dismissal based on a poisoned workplace, or a demand for bad faith damages as a result of the manner of dismissal, or a claim for damages to compensate for the mental distress caused by harassment or bullying.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

When will an employer be liable for bad faith damages?

Since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Honda v. Keays, dismissed employees have increasingly sought bad faith damages in severance negotiations and wrongful dismissal actions. A key issue in these claims is whether the employer’s conduct was sufficiently egregious to justify these damages. The courts are clear that not every perceived offence or instance of misconduct will give rise to a finding of bad faith.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Update on damages arising out of bad faith in the course of dismissal: Soost vs. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.

The Court of Appeal in Alberta has just ruled that there was no basis to award “The Damages Formerly Known as Wallace” in Soost v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., dramatically reducing the value of the award.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Arbitrator rules against GTAA in favour of employee

“Employees are not like tissues to be used up and then thrown out at a whim into a bin of low-level employment or unemployment.” The arbitrator in a recent case concluded that the Greater Toronto Airports Authority’s conduct in terminating a disabled employee was a violation of its collective agreement…

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,