federal election
It’s federal election day
May 2, 2011 Adam Gorley Human Resources
Employers must remember that employees are entitled to three hours away from work to vote today. According to…
Canada Elections Act, election day, Elections, Elections Canada, employment law, federal election, HRinfodesk, politics, right to vote, time off to vote, voting hours, voting leave
Employers’ obligations at federal election time and risk of non-compliance
April 29, 2011 Christina Catenacci Human Resources
There have been some advance polls, but May 2, 2011, is the official day when Canadians (hopefully more than predicted) will be voting in the federal election. Do you know what duties you have as an employer?
Canada Elections Act, democracy, duties of an employer, election day, Elections, employment law, federal election, May 2, politics, time off to vote, voting, voting leave
Election fever! Who’s got it?
April 29, 2011 Adam Gorley Employee Relations, Payroll, Source Deductions and Reporting
It’s that exciting time again, when somewhat more than half of Canadians over 18 will come together to select the people who will govern us until the next impassable crisis of parliamentary confidence. For some, it’s a celebratory time when we Canadians demonstrate our democratic will. For others, it’s a cynical time (I know: how can it be?) when incumbents and hopefuls tell us what we want to hear just to win their seats in Ottawa and their cushy benefits.
Canada Elections Act, economic recovery, economy, election, federal budget, federal election, HRinfodesk, pensions, politics, small and medium enterprises, small business, social programs, tax credits, tax cuts, time off to vote, voting, work-life balance
Search
Recent Comments
-
Court of Appeal hints that right to strike may be protected by the Constitution
Christina Catenacci Hi John, Thanks for your comment. Check out paragraph 67 of the decision: "Accordingly, none of what I have written above is to suggest or... – May 22, 4:38 PM
-
Court of Appeal hints that right to strike may be protected by the Constitution
John Beckman This is really spin doctoring the decision. My firm appeared at the Court of Appeal for an intervenor the University of Saskatchewan. Whatever the Supreme... – May 22, 1:00 AM
- Generated by BWP Recent Comments.
Connect with us
Blogroll
Categories
- Accessibility Standards (89)
- Announcements (30)
- Conferences (23)
- Human Resources (960)
- Corporate Immigration (73)
- Employee Relations (324)
- Employment/Labour Standards (309)
- Health and Safety (230)
- HR Analytics (32)
- HR Policies and Procedures (90)
- HRMS (40)
- Human Rights (270)
- International HR Law (2)
- Privacy and Security (91)
- Recruiting and Hiring (119)
- Training and Development (65)
- Union Relations (92)
- Payroll (201)
- International Payroll (1)
- Pensions and Benefits (112)
- Source Deductions and Reporting (50)
- Wages and Compensation (112)
Archive
Posts by author
- Alison J. Bird(14)
- Amery Boyer(12)
- Clear Path Employer Services(11)
- Adam Gorley(119)
- Alan McEwen(11)
- Andrew Lawson(56)
- Andrew Taillon(22)
- Christina Catenacci(134)
- Colin Braithwaite(2)
- David Hyde(18)
- Doug Macleod(1)
- Earl Altman(46)
- Occasional Contributors(20)
- Henry J. Chang(58)
- Ian J Cook(21)
- John Proctor(6)
- Lauren Bride(6)
- Maanit Zemel(1)
- Marcia Scheffler(15)
- Michele Glassford(12)
- Matt Lalande(9)
- Suzanne Cohen Share(20)
- Simon Heath(9)
- Stuart Rudner(42)
- Stringer LLP(12)
- Yosie Saint-Cyr(338)










