one month per year
November 24, 2011 Earl Altman Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Payroll, Wages and Compensation
Probably the most prevalent misconception in the area of employment law is the notion that all employees are entitled to “one month per year” as notice of termination without cause. This has, in the past, been referred to as the golden rule. In spite of repeated judicial pronouncements that the rule no longer applies, human resources professionals continue to apply it.
Bardal Factors, Bardal v. The Globe & Mail, character of employment, Dismissal, economy, employment law, length of employment, length of notice period, lump-sum payment, notice of dismissal, notice period, one month per year, re-employment prospects, salary continuance, specialized knowledge, statutory notice period, termination, termination package, termination without cause, unstable labour market, wrongful dismissal
I believe smoking (i.e., nicotine) is recognized as an addiction, as Simon mentions, which would engage the question of discrimination. – Jun 18, 9:40 PM
Even though as a non-smoking employer I support the actions of Momentous Corp, I am surprised they have even attempted to take this position, given... – Jun 17, 5:46 PM
Where in Human Rights does it say that smokers are now protected under one of the grounds and if so which ground are they protected... – Jun 17, 3:28 PM
