payment in lieu of notice

Employers ask: what conduct by an employee constitutes cause for dismissal

November 28, 2012 Earl Altman Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, 0

I am frequently asked by employer clients to describe what type of conduct by an employee will be held by the courts to qualify as cause for dismissal. Employers are often frustrated by the answer they receive – that it seems that nothing less than stealing money from the company will suffice. In the case of long time employees without prior instances of misconduct, theft may still be insufficient. A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court has fortunately clarified the circumstances in which courts will find cause for dismissal as a result of dishonesty. What is striking about the decision is the reliance of the judge on a seemingly insignificant act committed by a nineteen year employee.

benefits package, cause for dismissal, claims for medical expenses, Dependant coverage, dishonesty, employee conduct and behaviour, employee handbook, employment law, falsification of company records, falsified a claim, fictitious beneficiary under the policy, group insurance, instances of misconduct, payment in lieu of notice, policies and procedures, policy manual, reasonable termination notice, termination, termination notice, terminations, theft, wrongful dismissal