prohibited ground of discrimination
February 19, 2013 Simon Heath Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights,
Do employers have to accommodate the “childcare responsibilities” of their employees to the point of undue hardship? The Federal Court has confirmed that in the federal jurisdiction the answer is yes subject to the requirement that the childcare responsibility be a “substantial parental obligation”.
Attorney General of Canada and Johnstone, bona fide occupational requirement, Canadian Human Rights Act, canadian human rights commission, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, childcare obligations, childcare responsibilities, discrimination, Do employers have to accommodate the "childcare responsibilities", duty to accommodate, employers have an obligation to accommodate the substantial parental obligations of their employees, family status, Federal Court, federally regulated employers, flexibility in the workplace, human rights complaints, individualized plan of accommodation, judicial review, policies and procedures, prohibited ground of discrimination, substantial parental obligation, to the point of undue hardship, undue hardship, workplace rule
July 5, 2012 Stuart Rudner Employee Relations, Human Resources, Human Rights, Union Relations,
When mandatory retirement was eliminated, I noted that this change might create some interesting HR issues for employers of older workers. In the past, employers were often in a position to tolerate declining performance, comfortable in the knowledge that the employment relationship had a fixed “end date.” As a result, they could allow the employee to work out their last few years and retire with dignity.
age discrimination, bona fide occupational requirement, collective agreement, declining performance, employment law, Labour Law, Malik v. New Brunswick Human Rights Commission and Brunswick News Inc., mandatory retirement, older workers, performance management, prima facie discrimination, prohibited ground of discrimination, retire with dignity, retirement, retirement age
August 17, 2010 Earl Altman Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Human Rights
In a decision released on July 19, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario held that an employee who was fired because she was pregnant had been discriminated against on a prohibited ground…
British Columbia, constructive dismissal, discrimination, discrimination based on sex, Dismissal, human rights code, human rights tribunal, maternity leave, ontario, pregnancy and the workplace, pregnancy leave, prohibited ground of discrimination, repudiation of the employment relationship, small claims court, termination