First Reference company logo

First Reference Talks

News and Discussions on Payroll, HR & Employment Law

decorative image

Rule 23.2

Interim remedies at the HRTO revisited following termination

The previous article citing Tomlinson v. Runnymede Healthcare Centre discussed interim orders at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. Of note is the rarity of a decision that institutes compliance on the part of the respondent prior to the conclusion of the matter. In such a request, the burden of proof is placed squarely upon the applicant, as in Codrin v. Commissionaires Great Lakes.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ainmelk v. Jeoffrey: Interim remedies at the HRTO revisited

Although the Tribunal does have the power to issue orders in regard to compliance, it is rare that they are granted, based on a very specific criteria that must be met. One should review each guideline carefully before requesting such an order in the interest of time, money, and adding to the complexity of the matter.

 

, , , , , , , , , , ,