salary continuance
February 2, 2012 Stuart Rudner Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Source Deductions and Reporting, Wages and Compensation
Employment lawyers are generally quite adept at negotiating and resolving disputes arising out of the termination of an individual’s employment. We have all seen the statistics that only a miniscule number of dismissals result in a full trial and we know that in almost every case, it is better for the parties to reach a resolution than to proceed with litigation. That said, many traps exist in the settlement of a wrongful dismissal claim.
Canada Revenue Agency, CRA, Dismissal, EI benefits, Employment Insurance Act, employment insurance benefits, employment law, Income Tax Act, lump sum severance, negotiating and resolving disputes arising out of the termination, retirement, retiring allowance, RPP, RRSP, salary continuance, T4, T4A, tax withholding, termination, termination disputes, termination settlement, wrongful dismissal
November 24, 2011 Earl Altman Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Payroll, Wages and Compensation
Probably the most prevalent misconception in the area of employment law is the notion that all employees are entitled to “one month per year” as notice of termination without cause. This has, in the past, been referred to as the golden rule. In spite of repeated judicial pronouncements that the rule no longer applies, human resources professionals continue to apply it.
Bardal Factors, Bardal v. The Globe & Mail, character of employment, Dismissal, economy, employment law, length of employment, length of notice period, lump-sum payment, notice of dismissal, notice period, one month per year, re-employment prospects, salary continuance, specialized knowledge, statutory notice period, termination, termination package, termination without cause, unstable labour market, wrongful dismissal
October 19, 2011 Andrew Taillon Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Payroll, Wages and Compensation
Most employers are aware that any dismissed employee has a duty to mitigate. Usually, this duty arises in the determination of an appropriate severance payment to an employee. Where an employee contests the severance, the duty to mitigate will undoubtedly apply as part of the matrix of calculations to be determined.
duty to mitigate, employment contract, employment law, lump sum severance, ontario, predetermined severance, salary continuance, severance, severance period, termination