• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Free Coronavirus FAQ 🔬
  • Free Newsletter 📨
  • Get PolicyPro Free Trial 🎉

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Archives for January 2017

By Rubin Thomlinson LLP | 3 Minutes Read January 31, 2017

Additional employer obligations? Domestic and sexual violence

As of the writing of this blog, Bill 26 has passed second reading and is before the Standing Committee on the Legislative Assembly for consultation and, so it remains to be seen if the above changes will come into force. That said, with the recent legislative attention on protecting employees with respect to sexual harassment and violence, it is likely that employers may soon need to revisit their policies and programs to account for domestic and sexual violence.

Article by Rubin Thomlinson LLP / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Health and Safety, Payroll, Union Relations / accommodation, Bill 26, domestic and sexual violence, Domestic or Sexual Violence Leave, domestic violence, employment law, employment standards act, ESA, occupational health and safety act, OHSA, sexual harassment, Sexual violence, undue hardship, workplace harassment, Workplace policy

By Occasional Contributors | 3 Minutes Read January 31, 2017

Constructive dismissal and employer prestige

In 2016, the Court of Appeal of Quebec has clarified that reduced employer prestige cannot, in itself, serve as grounds for constructive dismissal in the specific context of business acquisitions.

Article by Occasional Contributors / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Payroll / 2108805 Ontario inc. v. Boulad, business acquisitions, constructive dismissal, employer prestige, employment contract, employment law, mitigate damages, terminations

By Occasional Contributors | 3 Minutes Read January 31, 2017

Le congédiement déguisé et employeur prestige

En 2016, la Cour d’appel du Québec a conclu que, dans le contexte de l’aliénation d’une entreprise, le fait pour un employé de passer à un employeur moins prestigieux ne peut, en soi, constituer un congédiement déguisé.

Article by Occasional Contributors / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Payroll / 2108805 Ontario inc. v. Boulad, acquisitions d'entreprises, atténuer les dommages, business acquisitions, changement unilatéral, congédiement déguisé, constructive dismissal, Contrat de travail, Droit de l'emploi, Droit du travail, employ prestige, employer prestige, employment contract, employment law, Gestion des Ressources Humaines, mitigate damages, mitiger ses dommages

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference Inc. (known as La Référence in Quebec) provides Canadian organizations of any size with practical and authoritative resources to help ensure compliance.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2021 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy