• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / A recent survey on job attitudes

By Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD | 3 Minutes Read October 29, 2010

A recent survey on job attitudes

facesI just read an interesting article saying that only 44 percent of Canadian workers were satisfied with their jobs. About 32 percent are somewhat satisfied and 24 percent are not very satisfied or not at all satisfied. That is a significant number of people (56 percent) who did not answer “very satisfied” about their jobs.

The random telephone survey of 1,000 Canadians conducted by Forum Research Inc. found that many Canadian workers are passionate about their professions, but much less satisfied with the actual jobs they perform or their monetary compensation.

What can we conclude from these results?

The president of the research company concludes that Canada’s workforce cannot remain competitive in a global economy in this state. The fact that workers are not satisfied could lead to a great deal of money lost in missed opportunities and high employee turnover.

Could this be a reflection of today’s economic troubles? The company plans to find out when they survey Canadians again in a year to learn about job attitudes over time. Economic factors could be significant, as the study found those working in manufacturing were the least satisfied. Given what has occurred recently in this industry, it is not difficult to understand this result.

Another interesting finding is that job satisfaction directly correlates to job level and age; that is, the higher the job level or age, the more satisfied the workers were. The majority of people (64 percent) who claimed to be “very satisfied” were executives. Only about 40 percent of the respondents less than 35 years old stated they had high job satisfaction at work.

Also, 54 percent are not satisfied with their compensation. This suggests that these employees may move to a higher paying job with a new employer once the economy improves. That said, 80 percent of the respondents stated they were proud of their company. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that major job jumping will occur in better economic times. However, a meaningful pay raise could make a significant difference for those who believe they are underpaid given their effort and work.

Lastly, one of the more troubling findings was that 32 percent of workers surveyed felt that their supervisor did not give them clear direction regarding their work, and 31 percent indicated that their supervisor never praised their work.

Research in the field of organizational behaviour suggests that mentally challenging work, equitable rewards, supportive working conditions and supportive colleagues significantly affect job satisfaction.

Furthermore, job satisfaction levels significantly affect work productivity, absenteeism and employee turnover. This is seen when examining how employees display their job dissatisfaction. For instance, employees deal with their dissatisfaction by leaving the workplace and finding a new job, voicing their opinion to try and improve the situation, passively waiting until things improve, or just waiting passively for situations to become a crisis and developing a pattern of absenteeism or reduced effort.

Why else is job satisfaction important to an employer? Workers who are satisfied stay with the employer over time, tend to be healthier and are happier in their personal life. Workers’ well-being is an important goal for employers since it creates a group of workers who have lower rates of turnover and absenteeism and higher levels of productivity.

In terms of supervisor feedback, most theories of motivation agree that workers are motivated by obtaining clear and direct information about the effectiveness of their performance. Employees experience internal rewards when they learn from their superiors that they personally performed well on a task they cared about. The more this occurs, the more workers increase their motivation, performance and satisfaction, and decrease absenteeism and turnover. This is especially true for workers with a high growth need.

Other factors that motivate workers include skill variety, task variety, task significance and autonomy. When these factors are combined, the addition of supervisor feedback is likely to lead to higher motivation, causing higher performance and satisfaction.

Perhaps raising salaries can raise job satisfaction levels. Maybe providing more interesting or challenging work is the answer. Or an employer could train supervisors to be more clear when giving instructions and providing feedback. Maybe training supervisors to refrain from micromanaging and provide employees with more autonomy is the way to go.

What do you think? How can we raise job satisfaction levels among Canadian workers?

Do you think these statistics will change once the economy rebounds? Do you think that these low rates of job satisfaction can be changed by increasing salary, mentally challenging work or supportive working conditions? Do you think that providing more frequent and clear feedback can make a difference in job satisfaction and performance?

Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD
Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD, is a member of the Law Society of Ontario. Christina worked as an editor with First Reference between 2005 and 2015 working on publications including The Human Resources Advisor (Ontario, Western and Atlantic editions), HRinfodesk, and First Reference Talks blog discussing topics in Canadian Labour and Employment Law. She continues to contribute to First Reference Talks as a regular guest blogger, where she writes on privacy and surveillance topics. Christina has also appeared in the Montreal AI Ethics Institute's AI Brief, International Association of Privacy Professionals’ Privacy Advisor, Tech Policy Press, and Slaw - Canada's online legal magazine.
Follow me
Latest posts by Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD (see all)
  • Hefty GDPR fine for Meta - January 20, 2023
  • 2022 report: More data breaches and costs rising - November 1, 2022
  • Bill C-27: a look at proposed AI provisions - August 9, 2022

Article by Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD / Employee Relations / Absenteeism, competitiveness, economic recovery, employee health, employee turnover, Forum Research Inc., improving job satisfaction, Job performance, job satisfaction, Manufacturing, organizational behaviour, productivity, rewards, supervisor feedback, supportive conditions, the economy, working conditions, workplace survey, workplace trends

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD

Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD, is a member of the Law Society of Ontario. Christina worked as an editor with First Reference between 2005 and 2015 working on publications including The Human Resources Advisor (Ontario, Western and Atlantic editions), HRinfodesk, and First Reference Talks blog discussing topics in Canadian Labour and Employment Law. She continues to contribute to First Reference Talks as a regular guest blogger, where she writes on privacy and surveillance topics. Christina has also appeared in the Montreal AI Ethics Institute's AI Brief, International Association of Privacy Professionals’ Privacy Advisor, Tech Policy Press, and Slaw - Canada's online legal magazine.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy