• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / Abuse of process to file human rights application after executing a full and final release

By Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD | 2 Minutes Read October 19, 2012

Abuse of process to file human rights application after executing a full and final release

I recently read a case where a human rights claim was dismissed. After an employee had signed a full and final release with the employer and then filed a human rights application, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal found that it amounted to an abuse of process. As the complaint covered the same subject matter as the release, the result was that the human rights claim was dismissed.

The employee, a personal support worker in a long-term care facility, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the ground of colour and creed, and reprisal.

Essentially, the employee felt she was subject to harassment at work, and brought her concerns to the manager. Instead of dealing with her concerns, the employer forced her to resign and sign a Minutes of Settlement. Then, the employee filed a grievance alleging her union did not represent her properly. The employee argued at the human rights hearing had nothing to do with her previous grievance against her union.

The problem was the release she had signed with her employer.

The employer requested that the application be dismissed because the employee had already signed a release covering the same subject matter.

Interestingly, the employee claimed she did not understand what she was signing due to her adjustment disorder and depressive mood disorder.

Notwithstanding that claim, the Tribunal agreed with the employer.

It was clear that the Tribunal had found on a number of occasions that filing a human rights application after executing a full and final release amounted to an abuse of process. Those applications end up being dismissed.

On examining the provision at hand, it was clear that the parties intended the Minutes of Settlement to be a final settlement and the employee was not entitled to pursue any further remedies regarding her employment, or the termination of her employment. This included remedies under the Human Rights Code.

Indeed, there were factors that could help set aside the release, but they did not apply in this case. The factors included:

  • whether the employee fully understood the significance of the release
  • whether the employee received sufficient and fair consideration for signing the release
  • evidence of economic pressure
  • evidence of psychological or emotional pressure amounting to duress

There was no medical evidence showing that the employee lacked the capacity to understand the Minutes of Settlement – her condition did include cognitive impairment that would prevent her from understanding, and the clinical notes provided from an assessment after the fact stated she had no formal thought disorder or cognitive impairment.

Moreover, the employee did not sign the Minutes of Settlement under duress. Therefore, the application had to be dismissed.

What can employers take from this?

Having a release is important when dealing with a departing employee who receives a settlement.

Also, when asking an employee to sign such a release, it is recommended that the employer:

  • make it clear for the employee to understand, and allow some time to think it over and seek independent legal counsel
  • provide sufficient and fair consideration for signing the release
  • do not pressure the employee in any way

Christina Catenacci
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Editor

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD
Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD, is a member of the Law Society of Ontario. Christina worked as an editor with First Reference between 2005 and 2015 working on publications including The Human Resources Advisor (Ontario, Western and Atlantic editions), HRinfodesk, and First Reference Talks blog discussing topics in Canadian Labour and Employment Law. She continues to contribute to First Reference Talks as a regular guest blogger, where she writes on privacy and surveillance topics. Christina has also appeared in the Montreal AI Ethics Institute's AI Brief, International Association of Privacy Professionals’ Privacy Advisor, Tech Policy Press, and Slaw - Canada's online legal magazine.
Follow me
Latest posts by Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD (see all)
  • Hefty GDPR fine for Meta - January 20, 2023
  • 2022 report: More data breaches and costs rising - November 1, 2022
  • Bill C-27: a look at proposed AI provisions - August 9, 2022

Article by Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD / Employee Relations, Human Rights, Union Relations / abuse of process, colour and creed, discrimination, employment law, execution of a release, fair consideration, grievance, harassment at work, human rights claim, independent legal counsel, Labour Law, Minutes of settlement, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, release, reprisal, signing the release

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD

Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD, is a member of the Law Society of Ontario. Christina worked as an editor with First Reference between 2005 and 2015 working on publications including The Human Resources Advisor (Ontario, Western and Atlantic editions), HRinfodesk, and First Reference Talks blog discussing topics in Canadian Labour and Employment Law. She continues to contribute to First Reference Talks as a regular guest blogger, where she writes on privacy and surveillance topics. Christina has also appeared in the Montreal AI Ethics Institute's AI Brief, International Association of Privacy Professionals’ Privacy Advisor, Tech Policy Press, and Slaw - Canada's online legal magazine.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy