Use of “and/or” renders ESA termination clause illegal
In Quesnelle v. Camus Hydronics Ltd. (2022 ONSC 6156) Justice Charney was faced with the following termination clause:
Refusing a return to work after layoff found to be a complete failure to mitigate
In Blomme v. Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation, 2023 BCSC 652, Justice Mac Naughton had a situation involving a 64 year old Plant Supervisor with 20 years service in a small town who was initially laid off due to COVID on April 4, 2020 with an unexpected date of recall.
Silence is not condonation in temporary layoff cases
In Pham v. Qualified Metal Fabricators Ltd., 2023 ONCA 255, an appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeal, the Court overturned the trial judge’s finding that because the Plaintiff did not actively protest his layoff for 9 months, that he had in fact accepted the legitimacy off the layoff and thus could not claim that he had been constructively dismissed at the time of the layoff.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 21
- Next Page »
