• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / Call for a ban on NDAs in certain cases

By Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor | 3 Minutes Read March 1, 2023

Call for a ban on NDAs in certain cases

Ban on NDA

On February 9, 2023, the Canadian Bar Association swiftly passed a resolution by a margin of 94% with little debate at its annual general meeting calling for a ban on the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to help victims of workplace harassment, abuse and discrimination to speak up about their experiences and find justice under the law.

Moreover, the resolution pushes to no longer use NDAs as a tool to silence those who come forward after experiencing abuse, harassment and discrimination, especially in the workplace context. The resolution came in part from a campaign founded by Julie Macfarlane, a professor emerita in the law department at the University of Windsor and co-founder of the Can’t Buy My Silence campaign, and Zelda Perkins. Perkins signed and later broke an NDA with disgraced former film producer and convicted sex offender Harvey Weinstein.

What is an NDA?

NDAs have become a default in settlement agreements for the last decade. NDAs are legal contracts in which people agree to keep the information outlined in the agreement strictly confidential. According to Macfarlane and Perkins, the contracts, typically signed by two people, were initially used to protect trade secrets in the workplace but have evolved into a common tool to silence victims and protect perpetrators.

What is the effect of the resolution?

While the resolution from the CBA is not law, Macfarlane says, it removes an obstacle from the government and the opposition of the legal profession and sends a strong message. With the resolution, the Canadian Bar Association committed to discouraging the use of NDAs to silence victims and whistleblowers who come forward to report abuse, harassment and discrimination.

The association also hopes the resolution will inspire companies to review HR practices and policies around NDAs within their organizations.

The association will also advocate and lobby for legislation and policies relating to NDAs at the federal, provincial and territorial levels.

Prince Edward Island became the first province to limit the use of NDAs by regulating the content and use of nondisclosure agreements. Similar legislation is being introduced in other jurisdictions.

The Prince Edward Island Non-disclosure Agreements Act (introduced as Bill 118) came into force on May 17, 2022. The purpose of this legislation is to support and protect Islanders who have been subject to harassment or discrimination from being silenced through non-disclosure agreements. Under the Non-Disclosure Agreements Act, any party responsible or person who committed or is alleged to have committed harassment or discrimination who enters into a non-disclosure agreement that has the purpose or effect of concealing the details relating to a complaint of harassment or discrimination will be guilty of an offence and be liable for a fine of not less than $2,000 and not more than $10,000. This legislation has important consequences for employers who may seek to conceal information related to allegations or proof of instances of harassment or discrimination. The Non-Disclosure Agreements Act imposes strict limitations approaching an all-out ban on such agreements.

The only instance in which a non-disclosure agreement related to allegations or the commission of harassment or discrimination as described above may be enforceable is in the event that such an agreement is the expressed wish and preference of the relevant person concerned. In other words, a non-disclosure agreement related to discrimination or harassment is only valid if such an agreement is the expressed wish and preference of the alleged or actual victim of discrimination or harassment.

The Prince Edward Island Non-Disclosure Agreements Act furthermore prohibits employers from entering into non-disclosure agreements with the person who committed or is alleged to have committed the harassment or discrimination for the purpose of preventing a lawful investigation into a complaint of harassment or discrimination.

Regardless of the above restrictions, the Non-Disclosure Agreements Act does not prohibit the inclusion or enforcement of a provision in a settlement agreement that precludes the disclosure of the amount paid in settlement of a claim.

We will keep you up to date on any other effects the CBA resolution will have on the topic and use of NDAs across Canada.

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor
Managing Editor at First Reference Inc.
Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B., is a trained lawyer called to the Quebec bar in 1988 and is still a member in good standing. She practiced business, employment and labour law until 1999. For over 20 years, Yosie has been the Managing Editor at First Reference. She manages the PolicyPro Human Resources and Internal Controls editions, The Human Resources Advisor editions, PaySource and the HRinfodesk news service as well as the blogs. Marie-Yosie (a.k.a. Yosie) is a recognized and respected author, with an extensive background in human resources, employment and labour across the country.
Follow me
Latest posts by Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor (see all)
  • Call for a ban on NDAs in certain cases - March 1, 2023
  • First Reference annual holiday donation, season’s greetings, and holiday break - December 23, 2022
  • Top 10+ First Reference Talks blog posts for 2022 - December 23, 2022

Article by Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor / Business, Employee Relations, Employment Standards / 'Discrimination, abuse, conflict of interest, employment law, NDAs, Non Disclosure Agreement, restrictive covenant, workplace harassment Leave a Comment

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor

Marie-Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B., is a trained lawyer called to the Quebec bar in 1988 and is still a member in good standing. She practiced business, employment and labour law until 1999. For over 20 years, Yosie has been the Managing Editor at First Reference. She manages the PolicyPro Human Resources and Internal Controls editions, The Human Resources Advisor editions, PaySource and the HRinfodesk news service as well as the blogs. Marie-Yosie (a.k.a. Yosie) is a recognized and respected author, with an extensive background in human resources, employment and labour across the country.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy