• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Free Coronavirus FAQ 🔬
  • Free Newsletter 📨
  • Get PolicyPro Free Trial 🎉

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
You are here: Home / Business / Can customers be encouraged to read privacy policies?

By Adam Gorley | 2 Minutes Read November 15, 2011

Can customers be encouraged to read privacy policies?

When was the last time you read a privacy policy? I use dozens of online services—email, social networking, data storage, banking, photos, shopping, etc.—and I’ve only skimmed a couple. What does this mean for the companies that offer these services? Can they reasonably say that they have informed their users of the content of their policies, if most users simply click “Okay” without bothering to read the things?
Mobile devices and applications only exacerbate the problem. Mobile users are even more impatient than desktop users to put the apps they download to use—and the screens, well, they might be fine for reading tweets, Facebook updates, and maybe longer things of interest, but privacy policies? No thanks!
This is the strange state we live in: users increasingly want companies to protect their information, but they remain unwilling to follow basic privacy principles, such as, you know, reading a company’s privacy policy.
Jim Brock, founder of PrivacyChoice, told the New York Times:

Everybody complains that no one reads privacy policies and that privacy policies are too long and too difficult. The mobile environment requires you to say things very succinctly, and it requires you to say things in layers.

PrivacyChoice analyzes and indexes online privacy policies. It has compiled hundreds of online policies and used the data to create a tool that allows organizations to create compliant privacy policies without a lawyer. According to the Times:

Developers who want to use the tool can select answers to basic questions about how they collect data, how that data is used and whether it can be deleted. … The resulting policy boils complicated policy language down to a few sentences like “We collect or share your location only with your permission” or “We keep personal data until you delete it.”

The app is based on law in the United States, and it is still in developers’ beta, but I’m sure Canadian organizations and application developers could apply the principles of simplicity and layers to their own privacy policies.
I think there needs to be a trade-off. Privacy policies should be written in short, plain-language sentences, and only as much information as is immediately necessary should be presented, but apps should present users with the information as needed, and require consent to proceed. If I were presented a short and clear policy statement (e.g., one–three sentences), rather than an invitation to click through to read a longer policy somewhere else, I would gladly read the former and ignore the latter. If that means I have to view these brief messages more frequently, that is the price I’ll pay to be informed. A reminder of the importance of the message might help.
Of course I have no idea if anybody else agrees!
But please let me know. Does your organization have trouble informing customers of your privacy policies? Do you worry that customers might not understand how you treat their personal information once you’ve collected it? Do you have clear policies that your employees can understand and apply?
Adam Gorley
First Reference Internal Controls, Human Resources and Compliance Editor

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me

Adam Gorley

Editor at First Reference Inc.
Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He contributes regularly to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.
Follow me

Latest posts by Adam Gorley (see all)

  • Legal recreational marijuana: how can you address the workplace risks? - October 15, 2018
  • Jeffrey Sherman to present at GTA Accountants Network | Early-bird rates, CPD hours - September 28, 2018
  • 2018 will be a pivotal year for employers and HR managers in Ontario – #LearnTheLatest - April 20, 2018

Article by Adam Gorley / Business, Privacy / cloud computing, compliance, data storage, email, mobile devices, mobile technology, mobile users, New York Times, online banking, online services, online shopping, plain language, privacy policy, privacy tools, social media, social networking

Share with a friend or colleague

Learn the 10 essential HR policies in the time of COVID-19

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Adam Gorley

Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He contributes regularly to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference Inc. (known as La Référence in Quebec) provides Canadian organizations of any size with practical and authoritative resources to help ensure compliance.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2021 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy