• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / Careful how you classify ‘interns’: Ministry of Labour releases policy statement

By McCarthy Tétrault LLP | 2 Minutes Read June 12, 2013

Careful how you classify ‘interns’: Ministry of Labour releases policy statement

It is a fact of life for some entering the labour market—the unpaid internship. For young workers, it is an opportunity to gain experience in a desired field. For employers, it is an opportunity to have recent graduates perform necessary work or apprenticeship at less cost all while assessing suitability for continued employment. Perhaps the modern internship is best explained by the following:

With the attention that “interning” has been getting in the media, including by Hollywood (see above) and by the recent HootSuite controversy, the Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) has taken notice and issued a recent policy statement that clarifies both the MOL’s position and that many intern relationships will not be considered as such by the MOL.

What is an intern?

In order for someone to be a true intern, and not an employee under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), the individual must be receiving training from an employer in a skill used by the employer’s employees. In addition, all of the following conditions must be met:

  1. The training is similar to that which is given in a vocational school
  2. The training is for the benefit of the intern
  3. The employer derives little, if any, benefit from the activity of the intern while he or she is being trained
  4. The individual does not take someone else’s job
  5. The individual is not being promised a job at the end of the training
  6. The individual has been told that he or she will not be paid

In addition, because the ESA does not apply to individuals who perform work under a program approved by a college or university, such individuals can properly be classified as interns and not employees.

Take-aways

While the MOL’s position does not change the law, it is important for employers to note the MOL’s increased focus on these types of issues (and with young workers in general). In industries with young workers or where it is common to have unpaid staff classified as “temps”, “interns” and “volunteers”, the MOL is much more likely (whether through an audit or a staff complaint) to closely scrutinize this issue and issue orders for breaches of the ESA. A finding of employment by the MOL could result in an order to pay minimum wage, vacation pay, holiday pay, etc. that the individual should have received had he/she been properly classified as an employee under the ESA.

In addition, for unionized employers, interns may be found to be employees under a collective agreement by an arbitrator thus entitling such individuals to the benefits of the collective agreement.

Given the consequences of an adverse finding and the potential liability, employers should carefully review their arrangements with interns with a view to minimizing the risk of such staff being classified by the MOL or an arbitrator as employees. The MOL’s policy statement is a good place to start.

Daniel Pugen
Ontario Employer Advisor
Published with permission from McCarthy Tétrault LLP

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
McCarthy Tétrault is a Canadian law firm that offers a full suite of legal and business solutions to clients in Canada and around the world. They deliver integrated business, litigation, tax, real property, and labour and employment solutions through offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montréal, Québec City, New York and London, UK.
Follow me
Latest posts by McCarthy Tétrault LLP (see all)
  • Bill C-26: Introduction of new mandatory breach reporting requirements in Canada - June 27, 2022
  • Considerations and risks of AI in employment decisions - May 30, 2022
  • 2021/2022 cyber/data outlook: Anticipated changes to privacy laws in Canada - April 25, 2022

Article by McCarthy Tétrault LLP / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Payroll, Union Relations / Apprenticeship, assessing suitability for continued employment, collective agreement, employment law, employment standards act, HootSuite controversy, intern relationships, interns, internships, Labour Law, labour market, Ministry of Labour, MOL, ontario, pay minimum wage, policy statement, potential liability, promised a job, skill used by the employer, temps, training, unpaid internship, unpaid staff, vocational school, volunteers, young workers

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About McCarthy Tétrault LLP

McCarthy Tétrault is a Canadian law firm that offers a full suite of legal and business solutions to clients in Canada and around the world. They deliver integrated business, litigation, tax, real property, and labour and employment solutions through offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montréal, Québec City, New York and London, UK.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy