• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Immigration / CIC issues additional guidance on specialized knowledge intracompany transferees

By Henry J. Chang, Dentons LLP | 3 Minutes Read July 21, 2011

CIC issues additional guidance on specialized knowledge intracompany transferees

CICBackground

On July 4, 2011, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (“CIC”) issued Operational Bulletin 316 (the “Bulletin”). The Bulletin contains additional instructions regarding the assessment criteria that should be considered when adjudicating specialized knowledge intracompany transferee work permit applications.

The background section of the Bulletin refers to a significant increase in specialized knowledge intracompany transferee applications that has occurred since the national labor market opinion exemption for IT workers was eliminated on September 30, 2010. Therefore, it can be inferred that the intention of these instructions is to further limit the number of temporary foreign workers who may qualify under this category.

Factors considered

According to the Bulletin, when assessing a specialized knowledge worker, officers should consider a number of factors to determine if the application supports the claim of specialized knowledge. These factors include:

  1. Education – is a diploma or degree required for the position sought?
  2. Knowledge – is it relatively unique within the company and industry in that it is not commonly held?
  3. Experience – does the experience with the foreign company/the respective industry support the claim of specialized knowledge
  4. Salary – is the salary realistic in terms of Canadian wage levels for the occupation concerned?
  5. Relevant training – does any previous training support the claim to specialized knowledge?
  6. Supporting documentation – do the resume, reference letters, etc. support the claim?

Additional guidance on the meaning of specialized knowledge

The Bulletin further states that it is normally not sufficient for a worker to simply have knowledge of the proprietary tools used or developed by the employer. A specialized knowledge worker would normally possess the following characteristics:

  1. Knowledge that is uncommon (i.e., beyond that generally found in a particular industry and within the company);
  2. Knowledge that has been gained through extensive experience and is difficult to acquire in a short period of time;
  3. Difficulty to train another worker to assume such duties;
  4. The required knowledge is complex in that it cannot be easily transferred; and
  5. A person possessing such knowledge would be in a position that is critical to the well-being or productivity of the Canadian employer.

Application of the National Occupational Classification

The Bulletin instructs officers to identify the occupation by evaluating the proposed job and matching it to one of the occupations listed in the National Occupational Classification (“NOC”). The following guidelines will then apply:

  1. The proposed position in Canada must be at a NOC level that is similar to or greater than the applicant’s position abroad, unless an exceptional situation exists.
  2. In conjunction with the foreign worker’s knowledge, education and experience, the NOC will also be used to determine the appropriate wage.

Required salary or wage

The Temporary Foreign Worker Guidelines relating to specialized knowledge workers already state that job offers must present salaries that are realistic in terms of Canadian wage-levels for the occupation concerned. The Bulletin clarifies that salaries of specialized knowledge workers in Canada should normally approximate the average wage for the stated occupation in the specified geographical location while working in Canada.

Salary calculations that include the use of per diems (i.e. allowances for accommodation, meals, transportation, etc.) in addition to wages, for the purpose of demonstrating that a realistic Canadian wage is being paid, are permitted. However, non-cash per diems (e.g., hotel, transportation paid for by the employer) may not be included in the calculation of the overall salary. Only allowances compensated in monetary form and paid directly to the employee are to be included.

For the purpose of assessing salary in relation to specialized knowledge, the Bulletin refers to www.labourmarketinformation.ca. Of course, this particular website no longer exists – it has been replaced by the Working in Canada website, which is available at http://www.workingincanada.gc.ca/.

The Bulletin does clarify that salary is only one of a series of factors that must be taken into consideration and that applications should not be refused on the basis of salary alone.

Significance of the bulletin

The Bulletin does not necessarily refer to any new factors that were not already mentioned (at least in general terms) in the Temporary Foreign Worker Guidelines, although it does provide more specific (and perhaps more restrictive) instructions on how these factors should be assessed. The Bulletin also contains a few surprising statements, including the following:

  1. That it is normally not sufficient for a worker to simply have knowledge of the proprietary tools used or developed by the employer (knowledge of proprietary tools used or developed by the employer probably should be considered specialized knowledge); and
  2. That the proposed position in Canada must be at a NOC level that is similar to or greater than the applicant’s position abroad, unless an exceptional situation exists (this was not necessarily a requirement in the Temporary Foreign Worker Guidelines).

In any event, the author’s most significant concern is that the Bulletin tends to emphasize a more in-depth analysis of the relevant factors and suggests that a much stricter assessment of these factors will be conducted in future adjudications.

Henry J. Chang
Blaney McMurtry LLP

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Henry J. Chang, Dentons LLP
Corporate immigration lawyer at Dentons LLP
Henry J. Chang is a partner in the firm’s Employment and Labor Group. He currently practices in the areas of Canadian and United States business immigration law, international business law, and cannabis law.
Follow me
Latest posts by Henry J. Chang, Dentons LLP (see all)
  • Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, foreign nationals in Canada may receive interim employment authorization while their inland work permit applications are pending - May 22, 2020
  • An analysis of US travel restrictions along the Canada-US border and US-Mexico border due to the COVID-19 outbreak - April 16, 2020
  • Government of Canada announces mandatory self-quarantine of international travellers in order to reduce the spread of COVID-19 - April 16, 2020

Article by Henry J. Chang, Dentons LLP / Immigration / Citizenship and Immigration Canada, employment law, Foreign workers, intracompany transferee, National Occupational Classification, NOC, Operational Bulletin 316, Required salary or wage, specialized knowledge, specialized knowledge intracompany transferees, temporary foreign worker, work permit

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Henry J. Chang, Dentons LLP

Henry J. Chang is a partner in the firm’s Employment and Labor Group. He currently practices in the areas of Canadian and United States business immigration law, international business law, and cannabis law.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy