• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Business / Competition bureau publishes draft guidelines for the production of electronically stored information

By Occasional Contributors | 2 Minutes Read October 17, 2014

Competition bureau publishes draft guidelines for the production of electronically stored information

On August 26, 2014, the Competition Bureau (the “Bureau”) published draft Guidelines for the Production of Electronically Stored Information (the “Draft Guidelines”) for public consultation. The Draft Guidelines sets out the Bureau’s preferred standard format for receiving electronically stored information during the course of an inquiry or investigation under the Competition Act (the “Act”), whether in response to compulsory or voluntary processes. The issuance of the Draft Guidelines is part of the Bureau’s Action Plan on Transparency, which aims to promote the development of a more cost-effective, efficient and responsive agency, while providing Canadians with more opportunities to learn about the Bureau’s work.
The Draft Guidelines apply to production of electronically stored information (“ESI”) within the following categories:

  • a court order issued under section 11 of the Act;
  • a court order issued under the Criminal Code;
  • a supplementary information request issued under subsection 114(2) of the Act;
  • a production pursuant to participation in the Bureau’s Immunity or Leniency Programs; and
  • a voluntary production of information.

Producing parties are encouraged to communicate with the Bureau prior to collecting and producing ESI to discuss production details.
Further technical instructions include the following, among others:

  • all ESI should be produced without passwords or encryption;
  • all ESI should be produced in its original electronic (i.e. native) format;
  • paper records produced as ESI should be produced as single page TIFF images with a resolution of 300 dpi and OCR generated text; hard copy photographs should be produced as colour .jpg or greyscale .tif, as applicable;
  • records should be produced in full, preserving the “parent/child relationship”[1];
  • the records should be indexed in response to the applicable paragraphs or subparagraphs in the order or request from the Bureau; and
  • all ESI should be provided on appropriate portable storage media (e.g., USB/flash drive, CD, DVD, hard drive) and should be identified with a label setting out the matter name, the contents and the date of production. Each medium should contain no more than 250,000 files.
    • The Bureau invites interested parties to provide their comments on the Draft Guidelines no later than October 27, 2014.
      By Jack Yu
      Republished with permission from Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP


      [1] For example, a fax cover, the faxed letter, and an attachment to the letter, where the fax cover is the parent and the letter and attachment are each a child.

      • About
      • Latest Posts
      Occasional Contributors
      In addition to our regular guest bloggers, First Reference Talks blog published by First Reference, provides occasional guest post opportunities from various subject matter experts on the topics of human resources, employment/labour law, internal controls, information technology, not-for-profit, business, privacy, tax, finance and accounting, and accessibility in Canada among others. If you are a subject matter expert and would like to become an occasional blogger, please contact us. If you liked this post, subscribe to First Reference Talks blog to get regular updates.
      Latest posts by Occasional Contributors (see all)
      • ChatGPT and charity law in Canada - February 28, 2023
      • New qualifying disbursement rules add directed donations anti-avoidance provisions complicate charity regulation - February 6, 2023
      • Ontario Court decision is first donor advised fund case and provides some certainty about DAFs - January 31, 2023

Article by Occasional Contributors / Business, Finance and Accounting, Information Technology, Privacy / Action Plan, Competition Act, Competition Bureau, compulsory or voluntary processes, cost-effective, court order, criminal code, efficient and responsive agency, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, guidelines, Immunity or Leniency Programs, inquiry or investigation, Jack Yu, passwords or encryption, producing ESI, production of electronically stored information, public consultation, transparency, voluntary production of information

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Occasional Contributors

In addition to our regular guest bloggers, First Reference Talks blog published by First Reference, provides occasional guest post opportunities from various subject matter experts on the topics of human resources, employment/labour law, internal controls, information technology, not-for-profit, business, privacy, tax, finance and accounting, and accessibility in Canada among others. If you are a subject matter expert and would like to become an occasional blogger, please contact us. If you liked this post, subscribe to First Reference Talks blog to get regular updates.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy