• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
You are here: Home / Privacy / Cyberlibel – Why your interactive website might expose you to liability

By Maanit Zemel | 2 Minutes Read July 12, 2010

Cyberlibel – Why your interactive website might expose you to liability

cyberlielIf you operate a website with interactive capabilities, such as a chat room, a blog, or even if you provide your readers with the option of posting their comments on your website, you may be held liable by a Canadian court for defamatory comments posted by anonymous strangers on your website.
The law of internet defamation is in a state of flux, as very few cases have reached the courts. However, the reported cases that have dealt with this issue suggest that a website operator may be held liable for internet defamation, if it had notice of the defamation but did not take appropriate and effective steps to remove the defamation in a timely manner.
In Carter v. B.C. Federation of Foster Parents Association , for example, the plaintiff alleged that defamatory statements about her were posted on a chat room controlled by the defendant. When advised by the plaintiff of the offending comments, the defendant website operator did not contact its internet service provider and request the removal of the statements from the chat room. As a result, the B.C. Court of Appeal held the defendant liable for defamation, even though it did not author the comments. In support of its decision, the Court stated:

“If defamatory comments are available in cyberspace to harm the reputation of an individual, it seems appropriate that the individual ought to have a remedy. In the instant case, the offending comment remained available on the internet because the defendant respondent did not take effective steps to have the offensive material removed in a timely way.”

In some cases, third-parties that are not the authors of defamatory statements but are the innocent publishers of such statements may rely on the legal defence of “innocent dissemination”. A publisher who has knowledge of the defamation, however, could not rely on this defence (hence the word “innocent”). In the Carter case, for example, the Court noted that the defence of “innocent dissemination” is not available to a website operator that does not take effective steps to remove the offending statements once it receives notice of the defamation.
Maanit Zemel, Associate
Miller Thomson LLP

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Maanit Zemel
Canadian Tech Law at Zemel van Kampen LLP
Maanit Zemel is a founding partner of Zemel van Kampen LLP, a boutique Canadian technology and litigation law firm located in Toronto. Maanit is a leading civil and commercial litigator and Internet lawyer with 20 years of experience. She has particular expertise in Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL), online defamation and cyberbullying, e-commerce disputes, and data privacy and cybersecurity law. Maanit has successfully represented clients before all levels of courts and tribunals, including the Supreme Court of Canada. Maanit is also a part-time Adjunct Professor at Toronto Metropolitan University and the University of Toronto, where she teaches courses on Internet Law, International Business Law and Cybercrime.
Follow me
Latest posts by Maanit Zemel (see all)
  • Breaking the “glassdoor” – Dealing with online reviews by employees - August 29, 2023
  • The unreliability factor of using AI in the workplace - June 27, 2023
  • The new privacy tort – Another victory for victims of cyberbullying - February 16, 2016

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Mastodon

Article by Maanit Zemel / Privacy / blog, blog post, Blogging, Carter v. B.C. Federation of Foster Parents Association, chat room, comments, cyberlibel, cyberspace, defamatory comments, defamatory statements, internet defamation, liability

The Essential HR Policy Guide Banner

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Maanit Zemel

Maanit Zemel is a founding partner of Zemel van Kampen LLP, a boutique Canadian technology and litigation law firm located in Toronto. Maanit is a leading civil and commercial litigator and Internet lawyer with 20 years of experience. She has particular expertise in Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL), online defamation and cyberbullying, e-commerce disputes, and data privacy and cybersecurity law. Maanit has successfully represented clients before all levels of courts and tribunals, including the Supreme Court of Canada. Maanit is also a part-time Adjunct Professor at Toronto Metropolitan University and the University of Toronto, where she teaches courses on Internet Law, International Business Law and Cybercrime.

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy

 

Loading Comments...