The Ontario Occupational Health and safety Act violence and harassment prevention provisions (Bill 168) require employers to provide information, including personal information, about a person with a history of violent behaviour if:
(a) A worker can be expected to encounter that person in the course of his or her work; and
(b) The risk of workplace violence is likely to expose the worker to physical injury.
This would require employers to establish some sort of notification procedure for persons with a history of violence (employees, patients, clients or visitors to the workplace) so that workers who might encounter the person are aware of the risk of potential physical injury in their workplace environments.
I don’t know about you, but this sounds to me like profiling. According to WordReference.com, profiling means: recording a person’s behaviour and analyzing psychological characteristics in order to predict or assess their ability in a certain sphere or to identify a particular group of people.
What did I tell you!
Yet the legislation limits the disclosure only to information that is reasonably necessary to protect workers from physical injury.
What a relief! Our profiling obligations have limits; however, there are no specific provisions in the law regarding the type and amount of personal information that must be provided.
What about the employee’s right to privacy, you ask? Somebody reminded me in a conversation that victims and perpetrators of violence own the information that is or will be potentially shared and disclosed with, or by employers. Applicable federal or provincial private sector privacy legislation and common law rights exist to protect the personal information of all individuals.
Thus, privacy legislation and the right to privacy under common law apply in such situations. To comply with privacy legislation and rights, an employer should inform a person of the purposes for which it will collect, use and disclose information, as well as obtain consent. An employer can only disclose information if it is related to the primary purpose for collection. Moreover, in some cases, the law requires employers to disclose information (for purposes related to the primary purpose) without the consent of the person who provided it, where an individual would reasonably expect the disclosure.
Applying this principle in the context of violence prevention under Occupational Health and Safety law means: only sharing information about a person’s history of violence when the disclosure is for the primary purpose for which the employer has a right to collect, regardless of whether the employer has explicit consent from the person with the history of violence. This means that if an employer allows a person with a history of violence to access its premises, and collects information on that person’s history of violence for the purposes of support, protection, prevention of violence and/or accountability for violence in their workplace, the employer can disclose the information for these purposes if an employee can be expected to encounter that person in the course of his or her work, and if the risk of workplace violence is likely to expose the worker to physical injury.
Moreover, if the employer expects an employee, patient or client to encounter a person with a history of violence in the course of his or her work and on the employer’s premises, OHS law obliges the employer to disclose that history (personal information). The disclosure is necessary to ensure the safety and protection from potential incidents of violence that may cause physical injury to employees’, patients and clients.
Employees, patients and clients who share their history of violence with the employer should be made aware of OHS disclosure rules, and be assured by the employer that their personal information will be protected by specific safeguards, including measures such as locked cabinets, computer passwords or encryption.
It does not end there. The disclosure requirement also has human rights implications for employers. The Ontario Human Rights Code prohibits discrimination on the basis of a record of offences. An organization cannot refuse to hire, continue to employ or treat differently with respect to employment policies and practices people who have criminal records for which they have received a pardon.
This implies that if an employer discloses (under the proper circumstances related above) an employee’s criminal conviction relating to physical violence for which a pardon has been granted, the employer could face a human rights complaint on the basis of the protected ground of record of offences. The disclosure could create a stigma on the person’s character. This means that employers have a responsibility to ensure that they are not taking part in, condoning or allowing discrimination or harassment to occur based on this prohibited ground.
It makes me wonder if the Ontario government fully understood how problematic the application of the disclosure requirement could be for an employer! What do you think?
First Reference Human Resources and Compliance Managing Editor
- First Reference annual holiday donation, season’s greetings, and holiday break - December 23, 2022
- Top 10+ First Reference Talks blog posts for 2022 - December 23, 2022
- EI sickness benefits extending on December 18 - November 29, 2022