• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Payroll / EI, CERB and wrongful dismissal damages

By Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm | 3 Minutes Read June 8, 2021

EI, CERB and wrongful dismissal damages

wrongful dismissal damages

Many wrongful dismissal cases settle because the employer agrees that some of the settlement funds will be allocated to non-taxable damages such as general damages for an alleged violation of a human rights statute. Doing so doesn´t cost the employer any additional monies but the employee receives more net money. For example, doing so can avoid the employee’s obligation to repay employment insurance (EI)  benefits received during the applicable notice period.

This blog discusses how Employment Insurance (EI) benefits or CERB benefits are taken into account when calculating wrongful dismissal damages during the COVID 19 pandemic.

In a recent case a judge concluded that CERB benefits received during the applicable notice period should be deducted when calculating wrongful dismissal damages. This case distinguished another case that came to the opposite conclusion so at the moment there is considerable legal uncertainty as to whether CERB benefits should be deducted from damages otherwise payable to an employee in a wrongful dismissal action. Given the significance of this issue, I suspect these conflicting trial decisions will be considered by an appeal court. Stay tuned.

Employment Insurance benefits

Employers and employees both pay into the EI system which is intended to be self-financed.  It is funded by way of a payroll tax; employers and employees both contribute.  In 2021, employees contribute up to $889.54 and employers contribute up to $ 1,245.36 for each employee. When calculating the amount of EI benefits an employee is entitled to receive the maximum yearly annual earnings is $ 56 200 which means a maximum weekly EI benefit is $ 595.

Before the COVID pandemic hit Canada, an employee was obliged to repay some EI benefits received if they subsequently received termination pay. To ensure this happens, some employers require an employee to obtain a notice of debt from Service Canada setting out the amount of EI that is required to be repaid before paying out any settlement funds and the employer pays Service Canada directly.

As a result of an Interim Order in relation to the EI Act for  EI benefit periods starting after September 27, 2000 until September 25, 2001 an employee is not required to repay EI benefits.

Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB)

CERB was introduced in the spring of 2020 as an income security measure for some people and was in effect from March 15 to September 26, 2020. It was much easier to qualify for CERB payments than for EI benefits. Recipients received $ 2000 per month for a maximum number of months regardless of how much the person was earning.  As a result, many part-time low paid employees were better off financially not working and as a result many service industry employers are having a hard time finding employees. On September 27, 2021, CERB was replaced by Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB) and under this program an employee is entitled to receive $500 a week for up to 38 weeks.

Neither employees nor employers paid  directly for CERB benefits. There is no self-funding system like EI or the workers compensation system in Ontario.

The CERB legislation did not explicitly state that an employee is required to repay benefits if an employee subsequently receives termination pay for the same period of time. To further complicate matters, during this period of time the federal government told people to apply for CERB using the CERB application process even if they were eligible for EI.

Bottom line: Given the legal uncertainty surrounding the issue of whether a judge will deduct CERB payments when calculating wrongful dismissal damages I suspect employee counsel will continue to allege their clients are owed non-taxable damages like human rights damages, aggravated and punitive damages. If all settlement funds can be allocated to non-taxable damages then this issue can be avoided. In my experience, however, employers will not allocate a large amount of a settlement to non-taxable damages unless there are facts to justify such an allocatrion. So the appeal courts will need to provide employees and employers with clearer direction on this issue.

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm
Employment and labour lawyer at MacLeod Law Firm
For the past 30 years, Doug MacLeod, founder of the MacLeod Law Firm, a Canadian labour and employment law firm, has been advising and representing employers in connection with employee terminations. If you have any questions, you can contact him at 416 317-9894 or at [email protected]
Follow me
Latest posts by Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm (see all)
  • Doug’s top 5 employment law stories of 2022 - December 13, 2022
  • Ontario government revokes law that violated unionized workers constitutional rights - November 8, 2022
  • Specific penalty clause renders an ESA termination clause unenforceable - September 13, 2022

Article by Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm / Payroll / Canada Emergency Response Benefit CERB, COVID-19, damages, Employment Insurance, employment insurance benefits, employment law, wrongful dismissal

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm

For the past 30 years, Doug MacLeod, founder of the MacLeod Law Firm, a Canadian labour and employment law firm, has been advising and representing employers in connection with employee terminations. If you have any questions, you can contact him at 416 317-9894 or at [email protected]

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy