• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / From the desk of the HR Manager: Regular attendance

By McCarthy Tétrault LLP | 2 Minutes Read August 18, 2014

From the desk of the HR Manager: Regular attendance

cubicles-officeRegular attendance is key to maintaining a successful, productive organization. A full-time job cannot be performed by a part-time employee. An employee should be expected to come to work ready to perform the requirements of their job every day; excessive tardiness and absenteeism cannot be tolerated. Managing employee attendance is critical in maintaining an efficient and effective workforce, and creates a number of challenges for organizations.

Perhaps the most significant challenge presented by poor attendance is the impact to overall productivity. If employees cannot be depended on to come to work when scheduled, operations may be short-handed, which can lead to unnecessary costs. Additionally, other employees may be forced to take-on more work in order to compensate for the missing individual. This can have impacts on overall employee morale and engagement, where there may be a perception that the absent employee is not pulling their weight, or is being given special treatment.

Accordingly, managing attendance effectively should be a key priority for all employees. Here are some tips:

  1. Implement an attendance management policy and program which establishes expectations and identifies specific, progressive consequences for each level of infraction. Make sure it distinguishes between culpable and non-culpable absences.[i] For example, generally speaking, employees cannot be penalized for non-culpable absences (e.g. statutory leaves).
  2. Consistently apply and enforce that policy. Employers must be diligent and consistent in managing absenteeism, but it is important to be fair and flexible.
  3. The Employer has a statutory obligation to accommodate employees who are disabled. There may also be a requirement under a collective agreement. In meeting this obligation, employers should alter or modify work methods or schedules, as well as make facilities accessible wherever possible. Ensure that any accommodation is based on dialogue with the employee and that the employee is providing the necessary information (see next point) so that the accommodation can work.
  4. Wherever possible, it is recommended that medical documentation be provided by a specialist who is treating the employee, rather than simply a note from the individual’s family doctor. Remember that some collective agreements have restrictions on obtaining medical information. Employers should be diligent in ensuring employees justify their absence and in determining the employee’s restrictions and functional abilities, as they may be able to accommodate the individual.
  5. Document, document, document! Keep records which account for all interactions regarding an employee’s record of absenteeism.

By Melissa Kennedy, a labour relations, employment and human resources specialist who assists clients with proactively managing compliance, risk and ensuring best practices are in place.


[i] There are two types of absenteeism: culpable and non-culpable (or innocent). Culpable absenteeism refers to an unexcused absence for which the employee is blameworthy (e.g. sleeping in, no call/no show). Non-culpable (or innocent) absenteeism, refers to a recognized and approved excused absence (e.g. vacation, bereavement, etc.).

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
McCarthy Tétrault is a Canadian law firm that offers a full suite of legal and business solutions to clients in Canada and around the world. They deliver integrated business, litigation, tax, real property, and labour and employment solutions through offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montréal, Québec City, New York and London, UK.
Follow me
Latest posts by McCarthy Tétrault LLP (see all)
  • Application dismissed: challenges in the workplace and performance management constitute credible non-discriminatory explanation for termination - January 23, 2023
  • The Digital Implementation Act: problems and criticisms – appropriate purposes - December 19, 2022
  • Should directors consider creditors’ interests when a corporation is near insolvency? - November 21, 2022

Article by McCarthy Tétrault LLP / Employee Relations, Employment Standards, Human Rights, Payroll, Union Relations / attendance management policy, collective agreement, come to work when scheduled, culpable and non-culpable absences, determining the employee’s restrictions and functional abilities, efficient and effective workforce, employee morale and engagement, employee’s record of absenteeism, employment law, excessive tardiness and absenteeism, functional abilities, HR manager, Keep records, Managing employee attendance, medical documentation, productive organization, Regular attendance, Statutory leaves, statutory obligation to accommodate employees who are disabled

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About McCarthy Tétrault LLP

McCarthy Tétrault is a Canadian law firm that offers a full suite of legal and business solutions to clients in Canada and around the world. They deliver integrated business, litigation, tax, real property, and labour and employment solutions through offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montréal, Québec City, New York and London, UK.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. D Cheng says

    August 19, 2014 at 4:37 pm

    I agree with Ian. A doctor’s note is enough. Personal medical history and conditions are private. In rare occasions (e.g. considering accommodation for an employee) can employers ask for these kinds of records, and only then by a trained employee like an OHS nurse. Not even HR can be exposed to those informations.

  2. Ian Ratchford says

    August 19, 2014 at 7:15 am

    Who ever wrote this article is helping a person start a lawsuit against any employer.

    Only in exceptional circumstances can an employer demand more than a doctors note. Telling an employee to provide specialists documentation is a total no no. There are some good ideas in this article. But! Delving into a persons medical background is just plain stupid.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy