• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 23rd Ontario Employment Law Conference 📅
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employee Relations / ‘Genetic characteristics’ as a prohibited ground of discrimination in Ontario?

By McCarthy Tétrault LLP | 2 Minutes Read November 21, 2013

‘Genetic characteristics’ as a prohibited ground of discrimination in Ontario?

A recent private member’s bill introduced by a Liberal MPP in the Ontario legislature would add “genetic characteristics” as a prohibited ground of discrimination to the Ontario Human Rights Code (the Code). As currently drafted, “genetic characteristics” would be defined as “genetic traits of an individual, including traits that may cause or increase the risk to develop a disorder or disease”.

The definition is extremely broad and could lead to some odd and frivolous human rights complaints. For example, an applicant for employment could conceivably claim that he/she was denied a job because his/her curly hair was a genetic trait. Or an employee could claim harassment based on a co-worker’s alleged “vexatious comment or conduct” about the employee’s hair colour.

To avoid this type of result, the bill will have to be studied and, hopefully, amended in committee so that its application is narrowed. One suggestion may very well be that the definition of “genetic characteristics” should be limited to genetic traits known to increase the risk of developing a disease (i.e., the second part of the current definition).

The bill also protects individuals from discrimination if they refuse to undergo or disclose the results of a genetic test. It seems that a much stronger case can be made for this type of provision to be included in the Code instead of a blanket prohibition on discrimination in employment based on “genetic characteristics” (or, at least, how it is currently defined). Indeed, this seems to be the real intent of the bill, given the MPP’s statement during first reading:

In essence, this bill would prevent employers and insurance companies from discriminating against Ontarians on the basis of genetic testing.

This will be an interesting development to watch. I expect that, because it is not a government bill, it will either gain little traction or be altered in the committee process.

Daniel Pugen
Ontario Employer Advisor
Published with permission from McCarthy Tétrault LLP

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
McCarthy Tétrault is a Canadian law firm that offers a full suite of legal and business solutions to clients in Canada and around the world. They deliver integrated business, litigation, tax, real property, and labour and employment solutions through offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montréal, Québec City, New York and London, UK.
Follow me
Latest posts by McCarthy Tétrault LLP (see all)
  • 2021/2022 cyber/data outlook: Anticipated changes to privacy laws in Canada - April 25, 2022
  • Maple Leaf Foods saves your bacon: Alberta Court of Appeal refuses to certify claim for pure economic loss - March 21, 2022
  • The tort of internet harassment: A new tort with an extraordinary remedy - February 22, 2022

Article by McCarthy Tétrault LLP / Employee Relations, Human Rights / discrimination, employment law, Genetic characteristics, genetic traits, harassment, human rights complaints, Ontario Human Rights Code, prohibited ground of discrimination

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About McCarthy Tétrault LLP

McCarthy Tétrault is a Canadian law firm that offers a full suite of legal and business solutions to clients in Canada and around the world. They deliver integrated business, litigation, tax, real property, and labour and employment solutions through offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montréal, Québec City, New York and London, UK.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Life Ant says

    February 3, 2014 at 8:48 pm

    But if people knew their genetic susceptibility, why would they need insurance at all? They’d already know what to use their money for.

    Insurance is a bet made under conditions of uncertainty. If you’re already certain, why would you want to make a bet and risk losing your premiums that you could use directly to fix your problem?

    Genetic testing could mean the death of insurance as it tips the scale of certainty in favor of individuals instead of statistical groups.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy