• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 23rd Ontario Employment Law Conference 📅
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Business / Proving consent under CASL: CRTC issues enforcement advisory notice

By Occasional Contributors | 2 Minutes Read October 17, 2016

Proving consent under CASL: CRTC issues enforcement advisory notice

spam-emailThe Canadian Radio–television and Telecommunications Commission (“CTRC”) has issued an Enforcement Advisory notice directed to businesses and individuals that send commercial electronic messages (“CEMs”) as part of their commercial activities. Notably, the sender of CEMs must have the consent of the recipient to send them a message, or else the message is considered spam. Section 13 of the federal anti-spam legislation (“CASL”) puts the onus on the sender of CEMs to prove that they have the proper consent, either explicitly or implicitly, to send the message. However, the CRTC has observed that some businesses and individuals are unable to prove such a thing.
Accordingly, the CRTC issued this Enforcement Advisory to remind relevant parties of the requirements pertaining to record-keeping in order to comply with section 13 of CASL. The Advisory reads, in part:

  • Senders of commercial electronic message should consider keeping a hard copy or an electronic record of, among others:
  • all evidence of express and implied consent (e.g. audio recordings, copies of signed consent forms, completed electronic forms) from consumers who agree to receive CEMs
  • documented methods through which consent was collected
  • policies and procedures regarding CASL compliance
  • all unsubscribe requests and resulting actions

The CRTC further stated that these types of practices can assist the sender:

  • identify potential non-compliance issues
  • investigate and respond to consumer complaints
  • identify the need for corrective actions
  • demonstrate that these corrective actions were implemented
  • establish a due diligence defense in the case of a violation of CASL

Businesses and individuals that are experiencing difficulty in obtaining consent or tracking it should consult the CRTC’s Guidance  on Implied Consent or the CRTC’s guidance on corporate compliance programs (Compliance and Enforcement Information Bulletin CRTC 2014-326).
By: Amanda Iarusso, Summer Student, McCarthy Tétrault LLP

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Occasional Contributors
In addition to our regular guest bloggers, First Reference Talks blog published by First Reference, provides occasional guest post opportunities from various subject matter experts on the topics of human resources, employment/labour law, internal controls, information technology, not-for-profit, business, privacy, tax, finance and accounting, and accessibility in Canada among others. If you are a subject matter expert and would like to become an occasional blogger, please contact us. If you liked this post, subscribe to First Reference Talks blog to get regular updates.
Latest posts by Occasional Contributors (see all)
  • What should charities do if they find out that a board member donated to the Freedom Convoy? - March 18, 2022
  • Accepting cryptocurrency for donations or payments can be quite risky for Canadian charities unless you know what you are doing - February 23, 2022
  • Being proactive with employee absences - January 26, 2022

Article by Occasional Contributors / Business, Finance and Accounting, Information Technology, Not for Profit, Privacy / anti-spam legislation, Canada's anti-spam legislation, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, CASL, commercial electronic messages, CTRC

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Occasional Contributors

In addition to our regular guest bloggers, First Reference Talks blog published by First Reference, provides occasional guest post opportunities from various subject matter experts on the topics of human resources, employment/labour law, internal controls, information technology, not-for-profit, business, privacy, tax, finance and accounting, and accessibility in Canada among others. If you are a subject matter expert and would like to become an occasional blogger, please contact us. If you liked this post, subscribe to First Reference Talks blog to get regular updates.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Conference
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy