• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Employment Standards / Right to disconnect

By Mordy Mednick | 3 Minutes Read August 31, 2022

Right to disconnect

right to disconnect

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it felt like there was no on/off switch between work and downtime, and that an employer could demand employees to respond to emails at any hour of the night.

Ontario’s new legislation aims to address this concern.

Employers may be surprised to learn that, whether they are aware of it or not, they could already have violated provisions of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”).[1] As of June 2, 2022, employers who employed 25 or more employees on January 1, 2022 must have a written policy on “disconnecting from work”, which has been termed in the media as the ‘right to disconnect’.

What does the right to disconnect mean?

Section 21.1.1 of the ESA now defines ‘disconnecting from work’ as “not engaging in work-related communications, including emails, telephone calls, video calls or the sending or reviewing of other messages, so as to be free from the performance of work”.

Despite the moniker, there is no new “right” being created. The only new requirement is for qualifying employers to have a policy in place that addresses their expectations on responding to work-related communications after hours, whatever those expectations may be.

What can employers do with the policy?

So far, it seems as though employers have wide discretion as to what they want to include in their policies. The policy must apply to all employees (including management), but it does not need to be the same for all groups of employees.[2] The new legislation only provides that qualifying employers must have a disconnecting policy in place, and that they must have done so by June 2, 2022.

Significantly, these policies are not required to include much else. It is for this reason that the legislation has been heavily criticized. The legislation provides little guidance as to how the policy should be enforced, and what is legally permissible under the ESA. Critics have warned that having a policy without any requirements will negate its potential benefits.

The Ontario Ministry of Labour publicized its suggestions on what employers should include in their policies, but these are not legal obligations. Employers will not currently be penalized if they do not follow the Ministry’s suggestions. For example, the Ministry of Labour recommends that employers only allow after-hours communications for emergencies. If an employer’s policy does not reference “emergencies”, they will not currently face any repercussions.

Moreover, few employers have published their policies to date. The Ministry of Labour does not require employers to file their written policies, only to have one distributed among their employees. Some organizations suggest limiting work-related communications to working hours, except in certain emergencies, or discouraging the use of after-hours communication among coworkers.

We are waiting for someone to challenge an employer’s written policy. The new provisions of the ESA are in dire need of clarification if they are to be of any practical use. Without further guidance from the provincial government, a court will need to interpret the “right’, or “suggestion”, to disconnect as it currently stands in the ESA.


[1] Employment Standards Act, 2000, SO 2000, c 41 at Part VII.0.1.

[2] Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development, “Written policy on disconnecting from work” (Updated 12 July 2022), online: Ontario.ca < www.ontario.ca/document/your-guide-employment-standards-act-0/written-policy-disconnecting-from-work >.

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Mordy Mednick
Lawyer at Dickinson Wright
Mordy Mednick is a partner in Dickinson Wright’s Commercial Litigation Group with a particular focus on business disputes, including employers’ obligations in the workplace. As a partner, Mordy has worked on a number of matters, including fraud, misrepresentation, employment, and breach of fiduciary obligations. During this time, he has frequently attended before the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and conducted numerous trials, motions and mediations.
Latest posts by Mordy Mednick (see all)
  • Contracting with contractors - January 25, 2023
  • Right to disconnect - August 31, 2022
  • Fiduciary duty of employees - July 27, 2022

Article by Mordy Mednick / Employment Standards / disconnect from work policy, disconnecting from work, employment law, employment standards act, policy and procedures, right to disconnect Leave a Comment

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Mordy Mednick

Mordy Mednick is a partner in Dickinson Wright’s Commercial Litigation Group with a particular focus on business disputes, including employers’ obligations in the workplace. As a partner, Mordy has worked on a number of matters, including fraud, misrepresentation, employment, and breach of fiduciary obligations. During this time, he has frequently attended before the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and conducted numerous trials, motions and mediations.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy