Canadian Human Right Act

Undue hardship – myth or reality? Learn the latest!

June 6, 2011 Adam Gorley Conferences, Human Resources, Human Rights

Every employer has experience accommodating employees due to their religion, family needs, health or disability. Accommodation is a necessary practice to manage a workplace today, and it’s the law in Canada, enshrined in the Canadian Human Rights Act and various provincial statutes. But every case of accommodation is different, and interpretations of the law vary.

accommodation, Allison Taylor, bona fide occupational requirement, Canadian Human Right Act, Disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, family status, frustration of contract, Meiorin, Meiorin test, obligation to accommodate, Ontario Employment Law Conference, reasonable accommodation, religious beliefs, undue hardship

Slaw: Canadian Human Rights Commission’s controversial ‘anti-hate’ policy

April 8, 2010 Yosie Saint-Cyr, LL.B. Managing Editor Human Resources, Human Rights

The Canadian Human Rights Commission recently posted a policy on its website concerning how it interprets and applies section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) when it receives an inquiry or complaint. The purpose of section 13 of the Act is to balance Canadians’ rights to equality and freedom of expression with respect to hate messages, as protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The parliamentary record indicates that section 13 was initially included in the legislation to address activities of individuals and groups who used the telephone system to disseminate hate messages. In December 2001, parliament amended the CHRA by adding section 13(2), which makes it clear that Internet hate messages come under the jurisdiction of the commission.

Read the whole article on Slaw.ca.

Canadian Human Right Act, canadian human rights law, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, CHRA, equality, freedom of speech, hate speech, human rights, section 13