human rights training
May 22, 2018 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights
An employer named in a Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Application, if decided against, may be responsible for both wage loss and most likely general damages.
A.B. v. Joe Singer Shoes Limited, Divisional Court, employment law, general damages, hrto, HRTO damages, human rights training, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, Kevin Sambrano, remedies, Sambrano Legal Services, Sanford v. Koop, small claims court, special damages, Superior Court of Ontario, the Code
May 24, 2017 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights
Brooks v. Total Credit Recovery Limited, a decision from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario examined words, their etymology, and their impact in the workplace.
ancestry, Brooks, Brooks v. Total Credit Recovery Limited, discrimination, ethnic origin, expert testimony, ghetto, human rights code, human rights training, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, Kevin Sambrano, poisoned work environment, race, the Code, workplace harassment
March 30, 2016 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Wages and Compensation
The applicant alleged that she was terminated when on her first day of work she disclosed to her manager, Ms. Cinzia Conforti, that she was pregnant. In contrast, the respondents attributed her termination to the applicant’s alleged request to work part-time, although she had been newly hired for a full-time position.
74 of Dodds v. 2008573 Injury to Dignity, compensation, damages, discrimination, discrimination on the grounds of sex, Dismissal, duty to accommodate, Employment Insurance (“E.I.”) maternity benefits, employment law, employment relationship, Faryna v. Chorney, feelings and self-respect, Human Rights code of Ontario, Human Rights Legal Support Centre, human rights remedies, human rights training, In ADGA Group Consults Inc. v. Lane, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano Human Rights Paralegal Toronto, Maciel vs. Fashion Coiffures, maternity leave, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Commission’s (“OHRC”), Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, policies and procedures, pregnancy, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Remedy for Future Compliance, termination, the Human Rights Code, Wage and Benefits Loss
June 22, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Recruiting and Hiring, Training and Development
A recent Ontario Human Rights case further underscores the employer’s ongoing duty to accommodate to the point of undue hardship, and that Code based harassment or discrimination constitutes a breach under the Human Rights Code of Ontario.
2252466 Ontario Inc. o/a The Ground Guys, age, ancestry, British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, colour, Disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, harassment, human rights remedies, human rights training, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, poisoned work environment, prohibited grounds of discrimination, race, Sambrano Legal Services, sex, sexual orientation, termination, the Human Rights Code
April 9, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services HR Analytics, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Rights, Training and Development
The recent Human Rights decision of Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Horton’s Store No. 2533, addresses what the Tribunal characterized as “heavy handed and unjustifiable” conduct on the part of the employer, when dealing with an employee with a disability.
discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, heavy handed, human rights remedies, human rights training, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, perceived disability, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Horton’s Store No. 2533, Sambrano Legal Services, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code, Tim Horton's
February 23, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Accessibility Standards, Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Integrated Accessibility Regulation, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Standard for Employment, Training and Development, Wages and Compensation
The human rights case of Emra v. Impression Bridal Inc. reminds us that a disability may be hidden, but when brought to the employer’s attention, it should not be ignored
ADD, anxiety, Disability, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, Emra v. Impression Bridal Ltd., Human Rights Legal Support Centre, human rights remedies, human rights training, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano human Rights, lost income, monetary awards, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, paralegal, perceived disability, prohibited grounds of discrimination, Sambrano Legal Services, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code
January 27, 2015 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Recruiting and Hiring, Wages and Compensation
In the summer of 2013 the applicant, Amanda Lugonia, began a new job at the same time she discovered she was starting a new family, the result of which was instant dismissal from her new employer. The respondent denied that the applicant’s pregnancy was a factor in the termination of her employment and in addition denied knowledge of the pregnancy, claiming the reason for her termination was due to lack of “fit”.
discrimination, employment law, human rights remedies, human rights training, inference of discrimination, injury to dignity, injury to feelings and self-respect, Kevin Sambrano, Lugonia v. Arista Homes, maternity leave, monetary awards, Ontario human rights commission, paralegal, pregnancy, prohibited grounds of discrimination, sex based discrimination, short-term contracts, short-term employment contracts, termination, the Code, the Human Rights Code
January 31, 2014 Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services Employee Relations, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll
On June 19, 2012 the Human Rights Code (Ontario) was amended adding two new protected grounds of discrimination, namely “gender identity” and “gender expression”. The first interpretation of these new grounds was examined in the Human Rights Tribunal decision in Vanderputten v. Seydaco Packaging Corp.
anti-harassment policy, discrimination, duty to accommodate, employment law, gender expression, gender identity, Gender Identity and Gender Expression, human rights training, human rights tribunal, Kevin Sambrano, Ontario human rights commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission Policy, prohibited grounds of discrimination, responsibilities of accommodation and safety, Vanderputten v. Seydaco Packaging Corp.
August 6, 2013 Employer Advisor, McCarthy Tétrault LLP Employee Relations, Health and Safety, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Training and Development
In a recent case the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal found that a facebook posting about a co-worker’s Mexican heritage was prohibited workplace harassment under the Human Rights Code .
ancestry, Citizenship, comments were unwelcome, discipline, discrimination, facebook, harassment, human rights code, human rights training, Ministry of Labour, occupational health and safety act, online, online postings, online workplace harassment, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, place of origin, postings on the Internet, prohibited ground of discrimination, race, social media, social media policy, vexatious, workplace harassment, workplace incident
February 18, 2010 Andrew Lawson Human Resources, Human Rights, Training and Development
Here’s a training tip I share with my workshop participants: Human rights sensitiviy training will probably not change racist opinions. Training will however let employees know how to file a complaint internally. This mechanism allows you to deal with the issue before it gets to the Human Right Tribunal. LEARN–DON’T LITIGATE.
human rights training, workplace training
Which is more practical, absolutely no office romance policy or allowed but need to disclose? IMO, the need to disclose, while accommodating, complexity and unnecessary... – Dec 15, 1:39 PM
Ageism is a big problem in the legal community. Bay Street firms and others are not interested in applicants' skills, knowledge, etc. unless they are... – Nov 16, 11:05 AM
Facebook posting about co-worker = workplace harassment
August 6, 2013 Employer Advisor, McCarthy Tétrault LLP Employee Relations, Health and Safety, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Training and Development
In a recent case the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal found that a facebook posting about a co-worker’s Mexican heritage was prohibited workplace harassment under the Human Rights Code .
ancestry, Citizenship, comments were unwelcome, discipline, discrimination, facebook, harassment, human rights code, human rights training, Ministry of Labour, occupational health and safety act, online, online postings, online workplace harassment, Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, place of origin, postings on the Internet, prohibited ground of discrimination, race, social media, social media policy, vexatious, workplace harassment, workplace incident