• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

not-for-profit

By Apolone Gentles, JD, CPA,CGA, FCCA, Bsc (Hons) | 2 Minutes Read January 9, 2017

Not–for–profits and charities: 4 New Year’s resolutions

Many people feel that New Year’s resolutions are passé, particularly since so many resolutions go unachieved each year. But, a resolution is essentially a plan to tackle something of importance, and planning is often half the battle. The following are 4 resolutions that can help strengthen charities and other not–for–profits in 2017.

Article by Apolone Gentles, JD, CPA,CGA, FCCA, Bsc (Hons) / Business, Finance and Accounting, Not for Profit, Payroll, Privacy / cashflow management, cybersecurity, internal control, non-profit, not-for-profit, phishing

By Occasional Contributors | 3 Minutes Read September 14, 2016

New case law dealing with CRA requests for documents

On June 3, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada released two important decisions dealing with requests made by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) for information. The cases highlight the fact that when an individual or an organization receive such a request from CRA, they should consider whether any of the information requested is subject to solicitor–client privilege. If solicitor–client privilege applies, the information should not be produced.

Article by Occasional Contributors / Business, Finance and Accounting, Not for Profit, Payroll / accounts receivables, Canada (Attorney General) v. Chambre des notaires du Québec, Canada (National Revenue) v. Thompson, CRA requests for documents, Income Tax Act, not-for-profit, solicitor-client privilege

By Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services | 2 Minutes Read May 13, 2016

Summary hearings at the HRTO: Is an alternative explanation enough?

When a respondent is first made aware that a Human Rights application has been filed against them, often their first response is to deny any accusations and to request a summary hearing in hopes of disposing of the matter at the outset. While such hearings may be requested, it does not always work to the advantage of the respondent. Such was the case in the recent Interim Decision of Lomotey v. Kitchener Waterloo Multicultural Centre.

Article by Kevin Sambrano, Sambrano Legal Services / Employee Relations, Human Rights, Payroll, Union Relations / 2016 HRTO 428, ancestry, collaborative agreements, colour, discrimination in employment, human rights code, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, interim decisions, Kevin Sambrano, Lomotey v. Kitchener Waterloo Multicultural Centre, not-for-profit, ontario, place of origin and ethnic origin, prohibited grounds, race, race and colour, racial profiling, racism, reasonable prospect of success, Reis v. Mississauga, Rule 19A.6, stereotypes, Summary Hearings, Tribunal process, Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy