wrongful dismissal damages

If the punishment fits: The Court of Appeal upholds Ruston v. Keddco Mfg. (2001) Ltd.

March 1, 2019 Rudner Law, Employment / HR Law & Mediation Employee Relations, Human Resources, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, 0

Our legal system is designed to implement a stringent appeals process. When an unsuccessful party truly believes that the Court ‘got it wrong,’ either because they wrongly assessed the facts or wrongly applied the law (or in some cases both), they have the power to appeal to a higher court who can review the ruling and issue their own determination, as was the case with Ruston v. Keddco Mfg.

Court of Appeal, employment law, notice period, Ruston v. Keddco Mfg, wrongful dismissal, wrongful dismissal damages, wrongful termination

Top five cases of importance to Ontario employment law – 2017 edition

January 2, 2018 Occasional Contributors Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Penalties and Fines

2017 has been an incredibly busy year for Ontario employment law practitioners. In addition to the changes to the common law brought about by the decisions considered in this post, one would be foolish to omit any reference to the sweeping changes recently ushered in by the Wynne government as a result of the Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act, 2017, S.O. 2017 C.22 (“Bill 148”).

Bill 148 the Fair Workplaces Better Jobs Act 2017, drug testing, employment contracts, employment law, Ontario employment law, termination, wrongful dismissal damages

OHSA in wonderland: Through the looking glass

June 13, 2017 Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm Employee Relations, Health and Safety, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Penalties and Fines, Pensions and Benefits, Source Deductions and Reporting, Union Relations, Wages and Compensation

If an employee alleges a violation of section 50 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”) then the employer must prove there has been no violation. This is called a reverse onus clause which means an employer must prove it did not violate OHSA. After a brief summary of the remedies that are available to employees under section 50 of OHSA, this blog discusses three recent cases.

aggravated damages, damages, disciplining an employee, employment law, health and safety complaints, lost wages, occupational health and safety act, OHSA, reinstatement, termination, workplace harassment, wrongful dismissal, wrongful dismissal damages

Probationary clauses: A double-edged sword for employers

March 21, 2017 Stringer LLP Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Recruiting and Hiring, Source Deductions and Reporting, Wages and Compensation

Many employers find it necessary to assess new employees’ performance on the job before making a final determination about whether an individual is suitable for a position. In the absence of an express term in an employment contract, employees in Canada are entitled to reasonable notice of termination at common law when they are dismissed without just cause. Many employers put terms in their employment contracts, such as probationary clauses, which limit this entitlement. However, employers may not always be clear on the implications of such clauses.

dismissed without just cause, employment contract, employment law, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority), probationary, probationary clauses, probationary employees, reasonable notice, termination, wrongful dismissal damages

3 tax tips for employers: Negotiating a settlement

February 24, 2017 Rubin Thomlinson LLP Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Source Deductions and Reporting, Wages and Compensation

Given the majority of legal disputes that settle before going to trial, the role of a modern civil litigator has shifted from not only being a courtroom specialist, but also being an expert in negotiation. The main goal in almost all negotiations for an employee is to extract a large payout, while the goal for the employer is to settle the claim while paying out as little as possible. Though lawyers use different techniques for extracting these results for their clients, I wanted to share three simple tips that are often overlooked when employers are negotiating a settlement.

canada pension plan, CCP, Dismissal, EI, Employment Insurance, employment law, general damages, negotiating a settlement, Notice of Debt, settlement, settlement funds, terms of settlement, wrongful dismissal, wrongful dismissal damages

Wrongful dismissal update: More kinds of damages being ordered

February 14, 2017 Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Source Deductions and Reporting, Union Relations, Wages and Compensation

Once upon a time, employees did not sign employment contracts with termination clauses and employment lawyers fought over the appropriate “reasonable” notice period. In 2017, however, employees now claim in addition to wrongful dismissal damages, human rights damages, moral or Wallace damages, punitive damages, and damages for the intentional infliction of mental stress.

damages, Doyle v. Zochem Incorporated, employment contract, employment law, harassment complaint, human rights damages, punitive damages, reasonable notice period, short–term disability benefits, termination, Termination clause, Wallace damages, wrongful dismissal, wrongful dismissal damages

Employers: A shining example of how not to treat your employees

August 19, 2016 Devry Smith Frank LLP Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Penalties and Fines

Unfortunately, reasonable accommodation for employees in the workplace continues to be the source of significant litigation and even today we continue to see outrageous examples of employers behaving badly. A prime example of employer misconduct for failing to accommodate and providing reasonable notice is the case of Strudwick v Applied Consumer & Clinical Evaluations Inc. This case highlights a number of important lessons for employers.

deaf employee, Employment Insurance, employment law, hostile work environment, human rights code, human rights violation, infliction of mental distress, punitive damages, reasonable notice, record of employment, Strudwick v Applied Consumer & Clinical Evaluations Inc., termination, workplace accommodation, wrongful dismissal damages

Disabled employee earning $22,000 per year awarded $110,000 damages

April 12, 2016 Doug MacLeod, MacLeod Law Firm Accessibility Standards, Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Standard for Employment, Wages and Compensation

Many employees now claim more than one type of legal damages in a wrongful dismissal case. This is particularly the case when the employee is disabled. The following case is a good example.

deaf employee, disabled employee, duty to accommodate, employment law, human rights damages, Ontario Human Rights Code, punitive damages, request for accommodation, terminating a disabled employee, wrongful dismissal damages

Superior Court applies the “Johnstone test” for family status discrimination in wrongful dismissal action

February 4, 2015 Stringer LLP Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Human Rights, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Pensions and Benefits, Union Relations, Wages and Compensation

We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone v Canada (Border Services), which helpfully crafted a clear and balanced test for family status discrimination in the context of childcare (the “Johnstone test”). The Ontario Superior Court has released the first reported decision in Ontario to apply the “Johnstone test” in the context of a wrongful dismissal action.

childcare obligation, employment law, employment standards act, family status, Family Status Accommodation, human rights code, human rights damages, Johnstone test, Johnstone v Canada, Partridge v Botony Dental Corp, pay in lieu of notice, wrongful dismissal damages

Can an employer be liable to an employee for previous service to a related employer?

April 11, 2014 Stringer LLP Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll, Recruiting and Hiring, Union Relations

In unionized industries and in particular the construction sector, there are well established rules governing when multiple companies can be considered a single employer under the law. Dozens of multiple employer applications per year are brought in Ontario alone. The same cannot be said about common employer determinations in the non-unionized sector. However, a recent case heard by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dealt with such a situation.

common employer, employment law, HR Law, king v 1416088 Ontario ltd, liability for employees’ service., non-unionized sector, notice and severance pay, notice period, past service, purchasing the assets of a business, related employer, sale of business, successor employer, terminated without cause or notice, termination, terminations, unionized industries, wrongful dismissal, wrongful dismissal damages

Old employment contracts can come back to bite you – or help you

October 23, 2013 Earl Altman Employee Relations, Employment/Labour Standards, HR Policies and Procedures, Human Resources, Notice, Damages and Settlements, Payroll

A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court considered the termination of an employee of Open Text Corporation who had been working for Open Text and its predecessor corporations for 17 years. There was no agreement governing his employment with the first company and it received little updating through two more acquisitions. When he was terminated, he complained that the original contract was void due to the transitions and sued for common law notice…

agreement governing employment, canadian employment law, common law notice, confidentiality and non-solicitation agreement, corporate law, corporate transactions, employment contracts, employment law, employment relationship, employment standards act, Notice of termination, severance package, termination an employee, termination letter, wrongful dismissal damages

Motions for judgment in wrongful dismissal − the Court of Appeal’s latest statement

July 5, 2011 Earl Altman Employment/Labour Standards, Human Resources

One of the difficulties faced by plaintiffs’ counsel in wrongful dismissal litigation is the length of time it can require to get a case to trial and obtain monetary compensation for the dismissed employee. Obviously, a plaintiff without a job is sensitive to the costs and delay which may result. This issue can often be addresses by way of a Motion for Summary Judgment.

accrued vacation pay, Bardal Factors, Bardal v. The Globe & Mail, canadian employment law, Di Tommaso v. Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP, employment law, employment standards act, monetary compensation for the dismissed employee, Notice of termination, notice period, Ontario Court of Appeal, Ontario Superior Court, summary judgment in wrongful dismissal actions, Supreme Court of Canada, temporary employment, termination, the end of the notice period, working notice, wrongful dismissal, wrongful dismissal damages, wrongful dismissal litigation

Obligations to disabled employees

February 9, 2011 Earl Altman Human Resources, Human Rights

Dealing with disabled employees can be a vexing issue for most employers. A number of questions arise when an employee takes time off either temporarily or permanently due to a disability, whether physical or mental. These issues include:

Disability, Disability benefits, disability insurance, disabled employees, duty to accommodate, employment contract, employment law, reasonable notice, Supreme Court of Canada, terminations, wrongful dismissal, wrongful dismissal damages