• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Free Coronavirus FAQ 🔬
  • Free Newsletter 📨
  • Get PolicyPro Free Trial 🎉

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
You are here: Home / Human Rights / Vaccinations and the workplace

By Sultan Lawyers | 3 Minutes Read January 4, 2021

Vaccinations and the workplace

With the first doses of the COVID-19 vaccines being administered in Canada, there is much chatter amongst employers and employees alike on whether an employer can make the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory.

With the first doses of the COVID-19 vaccines being administered in Canada, there is much chatter amongst employers and employees alike on whether an employer can make the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory.

At present, there is generally no legal requirement for Canadian citizens to receive vaccinations, subject to some exceptions, and as such it may be difficult for employers to mandate vaccinations as a condition of an employee’s employment without provincial or federal legislation to rely on.

Accordingly, we review current workplace health and safety legislation as well as human rights in anticipation of how the COVID-19 vaccine may be managed by employers in Canada.

Vaccination as a requirement of employment

Under Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”), employers have an obligation to get rid of known hazards in the workplace and to protect employees from work-related illnesses or injury.

Despite this, and while the Courts have previously upheld past vaccination requirements, it is unlikely that employers will be able to enforce the requirement that an employee get vaccinated without an order from provincial or federal health authorities as a justification.

As an alternative to mandatory vaccination, employers may instead simply encourage employees to get vaccinated to decrease the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace.

Employers interested in developing vaccination related policies are strongly encouraged to reach out to legal counsel to discuss the enforceability of such policies and the remedies available should employees fail to obey.

Employee refusal to vaccinate

Where an employer has established and implemented a mandatory vaccination policy, there may be limited recourse if an employee does not abide by the policy by forgoing the vaccination.

While an employer can elect to terminate the employee’s employment for breach of the policy, doing so may not only be costly to the employer in terms of termination and severance pay, but the employer may also be found liable for claims of wrongful dismissal, resulting in additional damages.

If the employer elects to fire the employee on a “just cause” basis because of an employee’s refusal to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, it will be difficult for the employer to demonstrate that the employee acted with wilful misconduct or disobedience.

Alternatively, if an employer instead terminates the employee on a “without cause” basis, the employer also runs that the risk that they will be found liable for wrongful dismissal, particularly if it appears the termination serves as a reprisal for the employee’s refusal to vaccinate.

Employers are encouraged to work closely with their employees to be transparent about the reasons for requiring vaccination as well as the reasons for refusal. If an employer ultimately decides that an employee should be terminated for refusing to receive the vaccine, we highly recommend that they first speak with an experienced employment lawyer to discuss alternative resolutions.

Accommodations related to vaccination

If an employer successful establishes a lawful mandatory vaccination policy, human rights laws may enable some employees to legally refuse to get the vaccine. Under Ontario’s Human Rights Code (the “Code”), an employee may forgo a mandatory vaccination and request an exemption for medical or religious reasons.

Employers may be expected to accommodate employees who cannot receive the vaccine for reasons grounded in law human rights law, including by allowing the employee to continue to work from home or providing personal protective equipment. Employers are expected to accommodate employees to the point of undue hardship, meaning to the point where providing the accommodation would result in financial hardship and/or health and safety risks for the employer.

An employee may have a human rights claim if they are not successfully accommodated or alternatively, if their employment is terminated following a refusal to receive the COVID-19 vaccination.

Employers should seek the advice of legal counsel before making the determination that an employee cannot be accommodated and electing to terminate their employment as this may serve as a reprisal to the employee for asserting their rights, a. violation of their human rights and/or a wrongful dismissal.

Takeaways

While mandatory vaccination with respect to COVID-19 remains unclear, we encourage employers to continue to seek out and follow advice from provincial and federal public health authorities in developing related workplace policies.

For now, it is unlikely that employers will be able to impose the COVID-19 vaccination as a mandatory requirement of employment. As such, employers may wish to consider alternatives to the vaccinations that are aimed at mitigating the spread of the COVID-19 virus in the workplace.

  • About
  • Latest Posts

Sultan Lawyers

Sultan Lawyers is a Toronto-based award-winning employment and immigration law firm, focused on all major aspects of workplace law issues with a subspecialty in workplace immigration. We help both employers and employees to plan proactively and mitigate risk, and to resolve disputes where issues escalate to the point where legal intervention is needed. Blog posts are written by Sharaf Sultan, Kristine Gorman, Santana DiNardo, Kirk Alcock, and Alvy Chowdhury.

Latest posts by Sultan Lawyers (see all)

  • Vaccinations and the workplace - January 4, 2021
  • COVID-19 and employment contracts: Provisions for consideration - November 27, 2020
  • Moving towards a second lockdown: Employment considerations - October 30, 2020

Article by Sultan Lawyers / Health and Safety, Human Rights / COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine, employment law, Occupational Health & Safety Act, termination of employment Leave a Comment

Share with a friend or colleague

Learn the 10 essential HR policies in the time of COVID-19

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

About Sultan Lawyers

Sultan Lawyers is a Toronto-based award-winning employment and immigration law firm, focused on all major aspects of workplace law issues with a subspecialty in workplace immigration. We help both employers and employees to plan proactively and mitigate risk, and to resolve disputes where issues escalate to the point where legal intervention is needed. Blog posts are written by Sharaf Sultan, Kristine Gorman, Santana DiNardo, Kirk Alcock, and Alvy Chowdhury.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference Inc. (known as La Référence in Quebec) provides Canadian organizations of any size with practical and authoritative resources to help ensure compliance.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2021 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy