• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • 24th Annual Ontario Employment Law Conference 📣
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Business / Toronto Humane Society investigation update

By Adam Gorley | 2 Minutes Read September 9, 2010

Toronto Humane Society investigation update

Charges dropped against Toronto Humane Society, former president
Charges dropped against Toronto Humane Society, former president

We reported earlier this year about The perils of bad governance in the case of the Toronto Humane Society. The non-profit organization faced a raid and subsequent investigation after complaints of serious mistreatment of animals, overcrowding, rampant illness and disease, disgusting workplace conditions and generally poor management. The Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals removed animals from the premises, confiscated documents, arrested the president and senior management and charged them with animal cruelty and conspiracy to commit an indictable offence, and discharged the board of directors and charged them with “non-criminal” animal cruelty.
That story outlined the potential and significant damage of poor governance practices: legal challenges and charges; fines; dismantling of boards; loss of goodwill, business, sales and staff; and so on.
But the newest development in the case is that the Crown has dropped all of the charges the OSPCA initially made against the humane society’s president and management. The Crown’s attorney argued that the society executed its raid and investigation in a way that “breached the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ protection against unreasonable search and seizure.” As a result, the court would be unlikely to admit any of the extensive evidence that the society had obtained.
So this has turned into a story about the perils of bad investigations and a warning about facing a government or regulatory investigation.
When conducting an investigation into a breach of policy, it is imperative that you follow your own investigation policy in a fair and consistent manner, and that your investigations policy comply with all relevant legislation or regulations. In particular, this means respecting employees’ privacy and human rights—avoiding the collection and disclosure of information outside the scope of the investigation and treating all current and former employees in a respectful and non-discriminatory way.
The principles of privacy and non-discrimination also apply if you face an official investigation, but in this case, employers will want to focus on limiting an organization’s exposure—for example, by involving legal counsel and only offering investigators the information they are legally entitled to, but also respecting the investigators and complying with orders.
Adam Gorley
First Reference Human Resources and Internal Controls Compliance Editor
Finance & Accounting PolicyPro from First Reference discusses investigations in a number of contexts, and includes a Search checklist to help protect your business when you face an investigation.

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Adam Gorley
Editor at First Reference Inc.
Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He regularly contributes to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.
Follow me
Latest posts by Adam Gorley (see all)
  • Can you implement a mandatory vaccine policy or ask employees if they have been vaccinated? - June 10, 2021
  • Do you know the latest on terminations? Find out at the Ontario Virtual Employment Law Conference - May 11, 2021
  • Announcing the 2021 Virtual Ontario Employment Law Conference - April 15, 2021

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Email
  • Print

Article by Adam Gorley / Business, Finance and Accounting, Not for Profit, Privacy / animal cruelty, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, exposure, governance, investigation, investigations, OSPCA, personal information, risk management, Toronto Humane Society, unreasonable search and seizure, workplace investigation

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Adam Gorley

Adam Gorley is a copywriter, editor and researcher at First Reference. He regularly contributes to First Reference Talks, Inside Internal Controls and other First Reference publications. He writes about general HR issues, accessibility, privacy, technology in the workplace, accommodation, violence and harassment, internal controls and more.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy