• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Health and Safety / Workplace violence in self-defence: What do you think?

By Andrew Lawson | < 1 Minutes Read September 28, 2010

Workplace violence in self-defence: What do you think?

Harassment and violence training are underway in several workplaces in Ontario. Employers are in the process of providing appropriate information and instruction to workers on the contents of their workplace harassment and violence policies and program, as required by the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act. In addition,

  • Workers may need to be trained to recognize and respond to harassment/violence or trained in specialized techniques to deal with harassment/violence.
  • Supervisors may need additional information or instruction, especially if they are going to follow up on reported incidents or complaints of workplace harassment/violence.
  • Employers, supervisors and unions also need to be aware of their responsibilities to prevent and address harassment/violence prohibited under Ontario’s Human Rights Code.

During one of these recent training sessions on workplace harassment and violence a worker asked the following question: “If another worker attacks me at work, I’m going to protect myself. Does this law [the Occupational Health and Safety Act] say I can’t do that?”

What do you think?

Your opinions and comments will be useful to my follow up blog post on the issue of workplace violence in self-defence.

QuestionsView Results

QuestionsView Results

QuestionsView Results
  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow me
Andrew Lawson
Trainer and advisor at Learn Don't Litigate
Andrew Lawson is a human rights and health and safety trainer and advisor, currently consulting to both the federal and Ontario governments. Since 1996, he has conducted extensive legal research in the areas of human rights and occupational health and safety law. He has worked in the people management business for over 25 years.
Follow me
Latest posts by Andrew Lawson (see all)
  • Responding to a human rights complaint - September 5, 2012
  • Ontario policy on competing human rights - August 8, 2012
  • What does the case of Trayvon Martin tell us about racism in Canada? - April 4, 2012

Article by Andrew Lawson / Health and Safety, Human Rights / employment law, Harassment and violence training, occupational health and safety act, ontario, self-defence, workplace harassment, workplace harassment and violence policies and program, workplace violence, workplace violence and self-defence, workplace violence in self-defence

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Andrew Lawson

Andrew Lawson is a human rights and health and safety trainer and advisor, currently consulting to both the federal and Ontario governments. Since 1996, he has conducted extensive legal research in the areas of human rights and occupational health and safety law. He has worked in the people management business for over 25 years.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Adam Gorley says

    October 1, 2010 at 3:33 pm

    I think that line is the key. Obviously, no workplace or law should condone violence in retaliation, but if someone attacks me at my workplace, and I don’t have the chance to run or avoid the attack, and I struggle with the person and maybe punch or kick him, I wouldn’t consider that retaliation. That’s self-defence and is perfectly defensible in my opinion.

    I don’t think the law should impel victims of attacks to just stand there and take a beating.

  2. Andrew says

    September 29, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    Sujata, you ask a very important question. I think there is a line between protecting yourself and retaliating. It may come down to what is reasonable in the circumstances.

  3. Sujata says

    September 29, 2010 at 11:20 am

    What about violence in self-defence? Doesn’t one have to protect oneself from immediate danger?

  4. Andrew says

    September 28, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    Any kind of violence is prohibited isn’t it? Calling the police may be more appropriate than retaliating. What do other people think?

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy