• First Reference
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Blog Signup 📨

First Reference Talks

Discussions on Human Resources, Employment Law, Payroll and Internal Controls

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies
You are here: Home / Business / Changes to Montreal's class action division shows move toward harmonization with Ontario procedure

By Occasional Contributors | 2 Minutes Read May 15, 2018

Changes to Montreal's class action division shows move toward harmonization with Ontario procedure

class action divisionEarlier this year, the Superior Court of Quebec Chief Justice Jacques Fournier and Justice Pierre-C. Gagnon announced changes to the class action division in Montreal’s judicial district. Coming into effect in late 2018, the division will hear all applications for authorization (known as certification in all other provinces except Prince Edward Island).
Under the new process, 10 designated judges of the Superior Court of Quebec in Montreal will hear all cases in which authorization has yet to be decided, including applications and preliminary motions. Each judge can expect to manage approximately 15 cases. The designated judges have been selected based on their experience in class action proceedings, which is expected to enhance case management of the authorization stage.
Once a class action is authorized, the case will be transferred to another judge from the civil division of the Superior Court of Quebec for trial management.
The new structure is similar to the current system in Ontario, where a designated number of judges case manage class actions at the certification stage.

Driving forces behind the changes

The new procedure departs from current practice where the same judge manages both the authorization stage and the trial. However, the cumulative impact of delays has meant that some cases were taking more than two years to move through the authorization stage.
When announcing the changes, Justice Gagnon, coordinating judge of Montreal’s Class Action Division, pointed to the significant increase to the class actions judicial workload since the enactment of the new Québec Code of Civil Procedure in January of 2016, which revamped Quebec’s class action regime.
Several recent decisions by the Court of Appeal of Quebec have confirmed the broad, permissive approach to authorization under the new Code: J.J. c. Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal, Charles c. Boiron Canada Inc., Sibiga c. Fido Solutions Inc. and Asselin c. Desjardins Cabinet de services financiers inc.
The Supreme Court of Canada has previously confirmed that class action authorization in Quebec has a lower standard than in common law provinces. The authorization motion judge’s role is essentially to screen out frivolous cases.
In 2017 alone, 65 new class actions were filed in Montreal, which brings the total number of active cases to 338. Judgments were rendered by the Superior Court in 175 preliminary motions, authorizations, and trial decisions.
The new class action process has widely been seen as a welcomed step towards creating greater efficiency and predictability. As class actions continue to grow in complexity, many see the new process as a modernized approach in light of the growing number of cross-border and multijurisdictional cases.
By: Éric Préfontaine, Jessica Harding, Alyssa Clutterbuck, Osler

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Occasional Contributors
In addition to our regular guest bloggers, First Reference Talks blog published by First Reference, provides occasional guest post opportunities from various subject matter experts on the topics of human resources, employment/labour law, internal controls, information technology, not-for-profit, business, privacy, tax, finance and accounting, and accessibility in Canada among others. If you are a subject matter expert and would like to become an occasional blogger, please contact us. If you liked this post, subscribe to First Reference Talks blog to get regular updates.
Latest posts by Occasional Contributors (see all)
  • Corporations Canada and new transparency about federal non-profit corporations under the CNCA and new fees for certain documents - December 21, 2022
  • How much should a Canadian registered charity spend on administration? - November 30, 2022
  • Finance proposes changes to disbursement quota for charities and some increased transparency - November 11, 2022

Article by Occasional Contributors / Business, Finance and Accounting / class action division, class action process, Class action suits, efficiency in the judicial system, Québec Code of Civil Procedure

Share with a friend or colleague

Get the Latest Posts in your Inbox for Free!

Electronic monitoring

About Occasional Contributors

In addition to our regular guest bloggers, First Reference Talks blog published by First Reference, provides occasional guest post opportunities from various subject matter experts on the topics of human resources, employment/labour law, internal controls, information technology, not-for-profit, business, privacy, tax, finance and accounting, and accessibility in Canada among others. If you are a subject matter expert and would like to become an occasional blogger, please contact us. If you liked this post, subscribe to First Reference Talks blog to get regular updates.

Footer

About us

Established in 1995, First Reference is the leading publisher of up to date, practical and authoritative HR compliance and policy databases that are essential to ensure organizations meet their due diligence and duty of care requirements.

First Reference Talks

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Resources
  • Buy Policies

Main Menu

  • About First Reference
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • 1 800 750 8175

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

We welcome your comments on our blog articles. However, we do not respond to specific legal questions in this space.
We do not provide any form of legal advice or legal opinion. Please consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction or try one of our products.


Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · First Reference Inc. · All Rights Reserved
Legal and Copyright Notices · Publisher's Disclaimer · Privacy Policy · Accessibility Policy